• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Black Talk Network (Update)

M

mwebster

Guest
A Washington Post/AP story provides an update on Radio One's plans for a Black talk-radio network.
<blockquote>On a recent conference call, Radio One Inc. chief executive Alfred C. Liggins III spent much of his time explaining to analysts how his large urban radio company could break the industry's sluggish boundaries. "We're in the black people business," he said. "We are in the business of aggregating audience for this particular demo and providing content to them." To prove it, he ran down the company's plans for next year, which include launching the first national talk radio network targeting a black audience ... </blockquote>
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/24/AR2005112400783_pf.html">
Read Full Article(Registration may be required)</a>

Radio One owns AM stations in Washington, Baltimore, Boston, Cleveland, Detroit, Richmond, Cincinnati, Miami, Dayton and Augusta (plus FM Urban music format stations in these and other markets). R1 also holds a majority interest in Reach Media which syndicates Tom Joyner.

Key points:
<ul>
[*]The new Black talk network will feed programming from 10 am to 7 pm (avoiding direct competition with Joyner).
[*]The Rev Al Sharpton's talk show will air in the late morning day part.
[*]2 Live Stews, a sports talk show from Atlanta, will air in afternoon drive.
[*]No program announced for middays so far.
[*]Radio One plans to put the Black talk network on AM stations the company owns and sell it to other Urban stations.
[*]R1 is targeting markets with a Black population over 15% of the total.
[/list]

One question: To what extent will this Black talk network erode the audience for progressive talk or cause the format (and its largest distributor, Air America Radio) to lose stations? Some AAR "affiliates" are low powered AM's which do not put a good signal into suburban and exurban portions of their markets; but might be better suited for a format targeting a mostly urban audience.

The best known host for this new "network," the Rev Al Sharpton, has been hosting a local weekend program on AAR's New York station, WLIB (a legacy from station owner Inner City Broadcasting Corp). He is a dyanamic and charismatic personality; he could be "the big one" AAR let get away. Shaprton has been a well known political and civil rights activist in New York City and elsewhere and campaigned for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2004. Radio One was a major contributor to Sharpton's campaign.
 
Of course, on the West Coast, stations will still run Joyner in AMD (does he have m/any PST affils?) and have to delay Sharpton if they want to air him. This will eliminate the 1-4p ET show and leave the Stews in early afternoons. Not a dealbreaker for larger markets who can locally program afternoon drive, or who don't mind picking up Bev Smith (who, of all places, I believe is still on libtalker Talk City/Sacramento).

> One question: To what extent will this Black talk network
> erode the audience for progressive talk or cause the format
> (and its largest distributor, Air America Radio) to lose
> stations? Some AAR "affiliates" are low powered AM's which
> do not put a good signal into suburban and exurban portions
> of their markets; but might be better suited for a format
> targeting a mostly urban audience.

You do make a valid point. While many of AAR's lower powered affiliates are in suburban enclaves that reach only some corridors of the city (like KXXT/NW Tolleson-Phoenix or WXKSKOX/"Boston"), some, like former affil WHAT/Philly, has always been suited for urban talk. In Cleveland, the peanut pattern of R1's WERE serves urban areas better than growing suburbia that might be more desirable to the brokered pill peddlers they solicit.


> The best known host for this new "network," the Rev Al
> Sharpton, has been hosting a local weekend program on AAR's
> New York station, WLIB (a legacy from station owner Inner
> City Broadcasting Corp). He is a dyanamic and charismatic
> personality; he could be "the big one" AAR let get away.

The comments from R1 above indicate that there will be no one "getting away". AAR is targetted to anyone who cares about politics. R1 is targeting to "black people". Said people don't come close to being a majority in any market of size, and it sounds to me like they're acknowledging that 70-90% of the population will never even listen (hint: African-American women under 40 won't tune in either).
 
Joyner is not a part of this new "network" and he will continue to be offered to Urban formatted FM stations.

Sharpton has the potential to be a major talk radio talent (progressive talk or urban talk). AAR let him get away.
 
> Joyner is not a part of this new "network" and he will
> continue to be offered to Urban formatted FM stations.
>
> Sharpton has the potential to be a major talk radio talent
> (progressive talk or urban talk). AAR let him get away.

No, you're correct, I'm just saying that it will be difficult in some areas. Fox Sports clears a path for Jim Rome live, since its affiliate mostly all run him.
 
> Of course, on the West Coast, stations will still run Joyner
> in AMD (does he have m/any PST affils?) and have to delay
> Sharpton if they want to air him. This will eliminate the
> 1-4p ET show and leave the Stews in early afternoons. Not a
> dealbreaker for larger markets who can locally program
> afternoon drive, or who don't mind picking up Bev Smith
> (who, of all places, I believe is still on libtalker Talk
> City/Sacramento).

Yes, Bev Smith is on KSAC/1240, and continues to be carried at 7 PM PT (after local hosts Christine Craft and Mary Jane Popp).

And the reason she's on liberal talk KSAC? The station's owner is Paula Nelson-Redfield, an African-American woman. KSAC, in addition to its liberal talk lineup (now mostly Jones Radio product with the move of AAR to KCTC/1320), has other "service elements" for the African-American community in its off-hour schedule...among them, blues music on weekends.

On topic here...I'm betting Radio One lobbies her hard to add elements of this new network to her schedule. Radio One, of course, has no stations in the Sacramento market, and will try to sell the new urban talk network to other operators in markets they're not in.

-OA<P ID="signature">______________
Ohio Media Watch - <a target="_blank" href=http://ohiomedia.blogspot.com>http://ohiomedia.blogspot.com</a></P>
 
Last I knew Cincinnati's WDBZ (IIRC, not owned by Radio One)'s African American talk was beating WCKY at least in 12+. WING in Dayton's ESPN programming should be safe, but its possible the new black network could end up partially on independently owned WDAO.
 
> Last I knew Cincinnati's WDBZ (IIRC, not owned by Radio
> One)'s African American talk was beating WCKY at least in
> 12+.

Radio One is now officially operating WDBZ, in an LMA with owner Blue Chip Broadcasting.

<a target="_blank" href=http://www.radio-one.com/map.htm>This map</a> of Radio One's properties confirms it.

-OA<P ID="signature">______________
Ohio Media Watch - <a target="_blank" href=http://ohiomedia.blogspot.com>http://ohiomedia.blogspot.com</a></P>
 
Bev Smith is currently syndicated by American Urban Radio Networks and is not mentioned as part of Radio One's offering. There is room for more than one player in Urban Talk, just as there is in Progressive Talk.

Not every show has to come from the same syndicator. Stations in each market don't have to carry the same line-up. As with AAR and Salem, some stations will take R1's feed whole and some will pick and choose. Major markets with large Black populations already have multiple stations targeting that demo. And since there is advertiser demand to reach Black consumers, it is likely stations will be drawn to Urban talk and other Urban formats. Urban talk could be a more active playing field than progressive talk, due partly to the fact that there are some very sharp players in the game (like R1).

However, some smaller stations may pick up R1's network without a local morning drive entry. This could provide a syndication opportunity for some established Black local hosts like Liz Brown from St. Louis or Mary Mason from Philadelphia, should they opt to go national or regional.
 
Will R1's effort be 100% wall-to-wall liberal? Or might they mix it up with the occasional black conservative?<P ID="signature">______________
..from the Ball Park Franks sponsored keyboard...</P>
 
> Will R1's effort be 100% wall-to-wall liberal? Or might they
> mix it up with the occasional black conservative?
>

They've only got three dayparts. One is Sharpton (liberal). One is a sports-talk show. No announcement yet of what goes in middays (opposite Rush and Franken). From a programming stand-point, it doesn't make much sense to go liberal->conservative->sports. They might counter-program with some sort of advice/lifestyle type show. It's anybody's guess right now (maybe Radio One doesn't know yet with what/whom they will end up).
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom