Re: The charms of Soft AC
> Soft AC DOES perform well in major markets, but ordinarily
> in Women 25-54/35-54, not 18-24. Usually--as in NYC--it's
> the only format actively targeting women over 40, so there's
> no direct competition and TSL is huge. It's been about 5
> years since I saw a WLTW breakout, and back then they were
> Top 3 in W25-54 and W18-49 but way down the list in W18-34.
> Nationally the core of the format remains women 40-49 and
> I'd respectfully submit that the WLTS target in State
> College is the 45-year old female, not the 21 year old. I'd
> also suggest that if there doesn't seem to be much
> conversation about Lite or Soft AC, it's probably because
> there isn't much to talk about--no (or minimal) airstaff, no
> (or minimal) promotion... no-risk playlist--the whole idea
> is to be quiet. Yes, it's hard to sell--competitors position
> it as "background" radio. On the plus side, Soft AC is very
> inexpensive to run, so profits can be great--even with
> modest billing.
>
>
> > ...for the reading impaired, let me clarify that the
> > majority of buys in the top 50 markets are done with a
> > non-ethnic ranker.
> >
> > > Funny how folks on this board and in the industry are so
>
> > > stuck on CHR. You never hear of WLTW/New York,
> > > KODA/Houston, KOST/Los Angeles, WLMG/New Orleans,
> KOIT/San
> >
> > > Francisco, KEZK/St. Louis…all are soft ac’s (gold based)
>
> > or
> > > hybrids of… and all are top 3 18-34 women and top three
> > (or
> > > better) in billing in their markets. Soft AC success
> > > doesn’t happen overnight, it took WLMG in New Orleans 5
> > > years of strong marketing and consistent programming to
> > > overtake the AC market leader, WLTS - and as our good
> > friend
> > > Paul Harvey would say Professor…now you know the rest of
>
> > the
> > > story. WLTS changed formats, and the call sign is now
> in
> > > State College. WLTS may not be a 9 share and probably
> > isn’t
> > > that strong 18-34’s…but it got the market’s attention
> and
> > > will remain a force to be dealt with. The biggest
> problem
> >
> > > the station faces is finding sales folks that can sell
> any
> >
> > > kind of radio format, much less understand the strengths
>
> > and
> > > objections of the soft ac format.
> > >
> > > > Bob & Tom's remarkable performance--sweeping nearly
> ever
> >
> > > > demo except 12+ (Froggy)--might be a one-time thing.
> > With
> > > so
> > > > few diaries to play with, it's pretty easy to see the
> > > > over/under sampling patterns. 18-34 was way under...
> > 35-54
> > >
> > > > was way over. Women were undersampled; men
> oversampled.
> > > > Biggest shifts from last book were in young women
> > (under)
> > > > and older guys (over). The "Bob & Tom" crowd--guys
> > > > 35-54--had a bunch of books in their hands. Arbitron
> > will
> > > > tell you that weighting will even things out, but with
>
> > > just
> > > > a handful of books in the whole market it doesn't take
>
> > > much
> > > > imbalance to get things out of whack. Anyway, don't be
>
> > too
> > >
> > > > shocked to see B&T (and Quick) back to normal next
> time.
> >
> > > >
> > > > If you're wondering if this relates to Lite's big
> jump,
> > > it's
> > > > on the "undersampling" side. When a demo is
> > undersampled,
> > > > weighting multiplies whatever AQH is noted. One or two
>
> > > > diaries from young women registered enormous quarter
> > hours
> > >
> > > > for WLTS and the weighting procedure doubled the
> value.
> > > And
> > > > that's how a Soft AC beats its co-owned CHR in 18-34.
> > > Again,
> > > > don't be too shocked to see 'em drop back to normal
> next
> >
> > > > time.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I know a certain car dealer and I will not mention
> his
> >
> > > > > name...but he REFUSED to EVER buy time as long as
> Bob
> > > and
> > > > > Tom was on the air bcause he personally found some
> of
> > > the
> > > > > content offensive. He was afraid that even with any
>
> > > > > popularity from the show, he may send out the wrong
> > > > message
> > > > > about HIS morals if he chose to put money behind it.
>
> > > > >
> > > > > It may do well in the book, but I doubt seriously it
>
> > > will
> > > > > ever be an easy sell for any sales team. Its just
> too
> >
> > > > much
> > > > > of a hot potato for most conservative businessmen in
>
> > > this
> > > > > area.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When WGMR had it on we had only a few people
> > sold
> > >
> > > > on
> > > > > it
> > > > > > and all of them out of the metro. Nobody else
> would
> > > > touch
> > > > > it
> > > > > > at all. It was a show that was expensive if there
> > was
> > > no
> > > >
> > > > > > return on that. When we dropped it we got 200
> calls
> > a
> > > > hour
> > > > >
> > > > > > but they were all from 75 miles away, it never
> > caught
> > > on
> > > >
> > > > > > locally.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> the biggest problem i see with many in the state college area is that as soon as the penn state football season starts all the stations are doing remotes for the game (obvious crowds) but what about the other demos that could care less about the game.....even this summer how many stations ventured out to say a community poool state park beach etc to give out station logo towels, bumper stickers t shirts etc..besides the arts fest....even tho some of these stations are primary voice tracked or linered get some one out there to meet the public.....
and as far as this conservative moral stuff regarding bob and tom...get over it.....if some of these so called conservative advertisers-(hey mr conservative bob novack said bullsh** on cnn yesterday) can swill beer and curse the blue lights out when they are in the woods they are public hippocrites...if you don't like bob and tom change the channel.....if someone doenst want to buy a car from you because you advertise on a controversial show they weren't a closeable prospect in the first place....have a great weekend