Check out Tom Taylor's Radio-info column today. Cox Radio's Bob Neil harshly critiques PPM sampling in Houston and Philly and Arbitron's efforts to educate the ad community about it.
Here's a sampling:
“Arbitron has massive problems with PPM samples in Philadelphia and Houston.”
Cox Radio’s Bob Neil has shot-gun blasts for Arbitron, going on record with the stuff he’s been saying in private – and this time he uses the very public forum of his own 2Q conference call. I’ll let Bob speak for himself: “We continue to believe the PPM has challenges, and we’re working pretty diligently in trying to point those out.” But he was just warming up with that, and later says “There are some sampling issues with Hispanics and African-Americans” and he charges that Arbitron’s already running into serious problems keeping its panel stable. And that “some of their excuses are contradictory” and don’t hold up, as far as Bob’s concerned. Like the one about Summer causing drops in the numbers. Neil says “The declines started two months before Summer started.
The Arbitron pledge to educate the ad-buyers “turned out to be a load of dog manure.”
I’m told that at least one transcript of yesterday’s “CXR” conference call doesn’t contain that pungent phrase, but I heard it live, and then went back and checked the recording, at the point where Bob Neil responds to Goldman Sachs analyst Mark Wienkes. When Cox put its John Hancock on the new Arbitron PPM/diary contract, it put Arbitron on notice that it would be a demanding customer – and now Bob Neil says “be careful what you wish for” – speaking directly to Arbitron. He says Arbitron’s repeated promises to inform the ad community about the “one time adjustment” in Cost Per Point “turned out to be a load of dog manure…it’s just not true.”
Here's a sampling:
“Arbitron has massive problems with PPM samples in Philadelphia and Houston.”
Cox Radio’s Bob Neil has shot-gun blasts for Arbitron, going on record with the stuff he’s been saying in private – and this time he uses the very public forum of his own 2Q conference call. I’ll let Bob speak for himself: “We continue to believe the PPM has challenges, and we’re working pretty diligently in trying to point those out.” But he was just warming up with that, and later says “There are some sampling issues with Hispanics and African-Americans” and he charges that Arbitron’s already running into serious problems keeping its panel stable. And that “some of their excuses are contradictory” and don’t hold up, as far as Bob’s concerned. Like the one about Summer causing drops in the numbers. Neil says “The declines started two months before Summer started.
The Arbitron pledge to educate the ad-buyers “turned out to be a load of dog manure.”
I’m told that at least one transcript of yesterday’s “CXR” conference call doesn’t contain that pungent phrase, but I heard it live, and then went back and checked the recording, at the point where Bob Neil responds to Goldman Sachs analyst Mark Wienkes. When Cox put its John Hancock on the new Arbitron PPM/diary contract, it put Arbitron on notice that it would be a demanding customer – and now Bob Neil says “be careful what you wish for” – speaking directly to Arbitron. He says Arbitron’s repeated promises to inform the ad community about the “one time adjustment” in Cost Per Point “turned out to be a load of dog manure…it’s just not true.”