• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Bob Tarsio takes on SSB debate

BabyDJ said:
Honestly, I'm not a big fan of your processors and have been hounded into trying to get an 11 by my management because of SSB. I have a 6, an 8400 and two Vorsis AM processors and wanted my own choices to replace my older gear. I'm actually happy that there are others that have come out with it.

No need for spin. Looks like totally valid data points to me! Should make for some interesting discussions at thew NRSC...

-Cornelius
 
The reception reports for all three stations were similar in that the SSB case was determined to be no better and in some cases worse than
the DSB case. The mathematical simulations in this paper concur with the anecdotal result of our earlier work. Work on this system was abandoned after it was determined that the system produced no net benefit.

Seems valid to me!
 
BabyDJ said:
The reception reports for all three stations were similar in that the SSB case was determined to be no better and in some cases worse than
the DSB case. The mathematical simulations in this paper concur with the anecdotal result of our earlier work. Work on this system was abandoned after it was determined that the system produced no net benefit.

Seems valid to me!

How about coming out from behind your 'BabyDJ' handle, and getting involved with the upcoming NRSC working group. You up to the challenge?

-Frank Foti
 
FFoti1 said:
BabyDJ said:
The reception reports for all three stations were similar in that the SSB case was determined to be no better and in some cases worse than
the DSB case. The mathematical simulations in this paper concur with the anecdotal result of our earlier work. Work on this system was abandoned after it was determined that the system produced no net benefit.

Seems valid to me!

How about coming out from behind your 'BabyDJ' handle, and getting involved with the upcoming NRSC working group. You up to the challenge?

-Frank Foti

Honestly I cannot as it could jeopardize my employment, but thank you for the offer.
 
BabyDJ said:
Honestly I cannot as it could jeopardize my employment, but thank you for the offer.

C'mon rather evasive. A technical consortium designed for the benefit of broadcasting, where your voice could be heard, and this would jeopardize your employment? Not buying it.

I have no opinion yet on this SSB idea, but at least some guys are out there trying to do something beneficial. What did Omnia do to make you so negative?
 
KMOXFM said:
BabyDJ said:
Honestly I cannot as it could jeopardize my employment, but thank you for the offer.

C'mon rather evasive. A technical consortium designed for the benefit of broadcasting, where your voice could be heard, and this would jeopardize your employment? Not buying it.

Unfortunately I am in a situation that is less than ideal, yet I'm happy to still have a job. My managers would probably not be happy with me taking their time to work on the NRSC commitment and I wish I had more time to get things done in my stations first.
 
BabyDJ said:
KMOXFM said:
BabyDJ said:
Honestly I cannot as it could jeopardize my employment, but thank you for the offer.

C'mon rather evasive. A technical consortium designed for the benefit of broadcasting, where your voice could be heard, and this would jeopardize your employment? Not buying it.

Unfortunately I am in a situation that is less than ideal, yet I'm happy to still have a job. My managers would probably not be happy with me taking their time to work on the NRSC commitment and I wish I had more time to get things done in my stations first.

You seem to have plenty of time to post on boards.
 
The Bob Tarsio paper presents some valid information. Just remember what is being done with DSP now is light years ahead of anything done in analog 25 years ago. At one time people thought direct carrier generation would never be possible. It is worth another look.
 
fm-engineer said:
The Bob Tarsio paper presents some valid information. Just remember what is being done with DSP now is light years ahead of anything done in analog 25 years ago. At one time people thought direct carrier generation would never be possible. It is worth another look.

I agree... actually that was my first thought when I read Bob's paper. I'm just afraid this will become another urban legend (which I have sat thru so many... how brand X processor doesn't pass EAS tones or how brand Y processor doesn't encode PPM correctly)
 
fm-engineer said:
The Bob Tarsio paper presents some valid information. Just remember what is being done with DSP now is light years ahead of anything done in analog 25 years ago. At one time people thought direct carrier generation would never be possible. It is worth another look.

Yep!

That's all we're saying too...

-C
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom