• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Bonneville should stick with the V100 format

I think that Bonneville should keep the V100 U/AC format in place for the time being. Why you ask?
Because it is a clean format. That's a good image for them. The music is decent. And they are beginning
to play a lot more variety of good classic r&b. I noticed that lately on the John Monds program between
6 and 8. Keep Diana and Cliff in the Mornings, they are great together. Keep Myke Julius for the love zone
at night maybe after 10 PM. For the other day parts, they might need to find other good air talents. As much
as I hate to say this, because I like him. They need to drop the Michael Baiseden Show.

At least Bonneville can brag that they do have a R&B format under their belt. Well, let's see what happens
within a year under their management.
 
955wdhf said:
I think that Bonneville should keep the V100 U/AC format in place for the time being. Why you ask?
Because it is a clean format. That's a good image for them. The music is decent.

It loses tons of money; if urban specialist Radio One could not make it, how would Bonneville? Too many stations for too small an African American core, too.
 
I was just listening to V100 in the car and the jocks have been set free to play what they want (a sure sign that the end is near) and it sure sounds good.

I can agree that the station was clean and did sound good, but I have to go with David on this one. The core audience in LA is now too small and they were losing cash at an alarming rate. I don't know that traditional news/talk will work on FM yet in LA but it would seem that Bonneville will give it a try anyway.
 
by the way , here is what Bonneville is doing on their DC outlet HD channels:

Do you ever get frustrated that you just missed the traffic or weather report on WTOP? Now you can get the latest report anytime, 24 hours a day.

Tune your HD radio to 103.5-3 for the latest traffic and weather report, updated every ten minutes!

iChannel is now playing on HD 103.5-2


iChannel is a radio station featuring unsigned bands and artists from around the country and around the world.

"The station allows for artists and bands from around the globe to have their music heard, and for listeners to hear great music from all genres from talented acts that have just not yet hit the big time," says Bonneville DC Vice President Joel Oxley.

"Even though the station features unsigned artists, the music that is submitted goes through a rigorous evaluation by radio music programmers to ensure it meets the criteria for airplay. So it's a really great, fresh sounding station featuring music that you just haven't heard and can't hear anywhere else."

Participation in iChannel is free of charge to the artists. They are able to submit their music for consideration and track their airplay via a website, www.ichannelmusic.com.
 
DavidEduardo said:
955wdhf said:
I think that Bonneville should keep the V100 U/AC format in place for the time being. Why you ask?
Because it is a clean format. That's a good image for them. The music is decent.

It loses tons of money; if urban specialist Radio One could not make it, how would Bonneville? Too many stations for too small an African American core, too.
I hate to admit it, but I actually agree with David. It isn't that V-100 isn't a good station, just not for The L.A. market. Hot 92.3 (Clear Channel) is killing them. Besides, Radio One just didn't know how to appeal to the hispanic demo of L.A. like Clear Channel does with Hot 92.3.
 
Hamp said:
DavidEduardo said:
955wdhf said:
I think that Bonneville should keep the V100 U/AC format in place for the time being. Why you ask?
Because it is a clean format. That's a good image for them. The music is decent.

It loses tons of money; if urban specialist Radio One could not make it, how would Bonneville? Too many stations for too small an African American core, too.
I hate to admit it, but I actually agree with David. It isn't that V-100 isn't a good station, just not for The L.A. market. Hot 92.3 (Clear Channel) is killing them. Besides, Radio One just didn't know how to appeal to the hispanic demo of L.A. like Clear Channel does with Hot 92.3.

I also agree but IMO V-100 was never a good station and it could have been for the LA market but Radio One not only did not know how to appeal to hispanics, they also did not know how to appeal to blacks in LA as well. There are too many other choices to hear R&B in LA and they offered nothing different or special. Plus, they made a lot of mistakes and turned off a lot of thier audience when they came into LA.

What RO did is here is not surprising to me and most of RO's stations across the country sound worse than thier competitors in other markets. They really only do well in markets where they have no competition. IMO, RO got what they deserved and that is to fail and fail hard in LA.

They will now be finally gone from LA and they are no way the urban specialist as they claim. Hopefully KJLH will benefit from RO's exit from the LA market. Cliff Winston and Diana Steele will be missed, but maybe they will turn up someplace else in the future.
 
955wdhf said:
I think that Bonneville should keep the V100 U/AC format in place for the time being. Why you ask?
Because it is a clean format. That's a good image for them. The music is decent. And they are beginning
to play a lot more variety of good classic r&b. I noticed that lately on the John Monds program between
6 and 8. Keep Diana and Cliff in the Mornings, they are great together. Keep Myke Julius for the love zone
at night maybe after 10 PM. For the other day parts, they might need to find other good air talents. As much
as I hate to say this, because I like him. They need to drop the Michael Baiseden Show.

At least Bonneville can brag that they do have a R&B format under their belt. Well, let's see what happens
within a year under their management.

Don't hold your breath and things go deeper than it being "clean format" with that company and the urban audience. Bonneville is not in the business of catering to the urban audience. They never have and they never will. And I do not think the urban audience here in LA or anywhere else would be happy with an urban station being owned by a company such as Bonneville.
 
2djdramah said:
I also agree but IMO V-100 was never a good station and it could have been for the LA market but Radio One not only did not know how to appeal to hispanics, they also did not know how to appeal to blacks in LA as well. There are too many other choices to hear R&B in LA and they offered nothing different or special. Plus, they made a lot of mistakes and turned off a lot of thier audience when they came into LA.

Whether V 100 was a good urban AC or not is not the issue. There is just not enough audience for an urban AC in LA.

Look at the analytical hiararchy: LA is only abut 8% Black. Not all Blacks like urban AC. Backs listen to everything from urban and smooth jazz to KNX, too. Hispanics in the Southwest as a rule do not like urban AC at all (it's too r&b). The potential share for a 25-44 targeted urban AC is, thus, well below a 2.

This is a lot like the much discussed country format. KKGO may not be a perfect implementation, but it is the only one. If it were really good, it might get 0.2 or 0.3 shares more. But there is no more milk in that cow than abou a 1.5 to 1.6 average in LA.

Urban AC just can not be justified here. The bad decision was to stick with an "all Black appeal" format in a amrket where coalition audiences are the choice. Look at what Harold Austin, who is Hispanic, did with the Beat in the "no color lines" era!
 
DavidEduardo said:
2djdramah said:
I also agree but IMO V-100 was never a good station and it could have been for the LA market but Radio One not only did not know how to appeal to hispanics, they also did not know how to appeal to blacks in LA as well. There are too many other choices to hear R&B in LA and they offered nothing different or special. Plus, they made a lot of mistakes and turned off a lot of thier audience when they came into LA.

Whether V 100 was a good urban AC or not is not the issue. There is just not enough audience for an urban AC in LA.

Look at the analytical hiararchy: LA is only abut 8% Black. Not all Blacks like urban AC. Backs listen to everything from urban and smooth jazz to KNX, too. Hispanics in the Southwest as a rule do not like urban AC at all (it's too r&b). The potential share for a 25-44 targeted urban AC is, thus, well below a 2.

This is a lot like the much discussed country format. KKGO may not be a perfect implementation, but it is the only one. If it were really good, it might get 0.2 or 0.3 shares more. But there is no more milk in that cow than abou a 1.5 to 1.6 average in LA.

Urban AC just can not be justified here. The bad decision was to stick with an "all Black appeal" format in a amrket where coalition audiences are the choice. Look at what Harold Austin, who is Hispanic, did with the Beat in the "no color lines" era!

I am not going to get into a pissing contest with you over over the issue of whether or not Urban AC is viable in LA.

If Urban AC cannot be justified here in LA, then explain to me why Hot 92.3 is in the market? By your logic, hispanics do not like Urban AC because it is too R&B then why are they listening to Hot 92.3? That is what they play...........R&B...period. And they report themselves to the industry trades as an URBAN AC formatted station and that is what they are. So according to your logic, since Hispanics do not like R&B, then Hot 92.3 needs to go away as well. Oh snap....the station has been above a 2 as well for several books. Format oversaturation and not targeting blacks AND hispanics was RO's problem period.....the 8% you like to equate as being not important, was listening to everyone else, not V-100.

The white population has dropped drastically and is shrinking faster than any other group in LA (funny how no one mentions that here) but there is still room for a country station in this market, not but five stations offering some sort of country product in thier playlists like the situation we have with R&B and in particular, old school R&B. Yes there is room for Urban AC in LA on one station maybe two at most.
 
2djdramah said:
DavidEduardo said:
2djdramah said:
I also agree but IMO V-100 was never a good station and it could have been for the LA market but Radio One not only did not know how to appeal to hispanics, they also did not know how to appeal to blacks in LA as well. There are too many other choices to hear R&B in LA and they offered nothing different or special. Plus, they made a lot of mistakes and turned off a lot of thier audience when they came into LA.

Whether V 100 was a good urban AC or not is not the issue. There is just not enough audience for an urban AC in LA.

Look at the analytical hiararchy: LA is only abut 8% Black. Not all Blacks like urban AC. Backs listen to everything from urban and smooth jazz to KNX, too. Hispanics in the Southwest as a rule do not like urban AC at all (it's too r&b). The potential share for a 25-44 targeted urban AC is, thus, well below a 2.

This is a lot like the much discussed country format. KKGO may not be a perfect implementation, but it is the only one. If it were really good, it might get 0.2 or 0.3 shares more. But there is no more milk in that cow than abou a 1.5 to 1.6 average in LA.

Urban AC just can not be justified here. The bad decision was to stick with an "all Black appeal" format in a amrket where coalition audiences are the choice. Look at what Harold Austin, who is Hispanic, did with the Beat in the "no color lines" era!
[/quote
 
DavidEduardo said:
The bad decision was to stick with an "all Black appeal" format in a amrket where coalition audiences are the choice. Look at what Harold Austin, who is Hispanic, did with the Beat in the "no color lines" era!

If "coalition audiences are the choice" in this market then explain why a station would call themselves "latino 96.3?" just from that name I don't even want to listen even though I like reggaeton. I don't recall RO naming their station "black 100.3"
 
2djdramah said:
If Urban AC cannot be justified here in LA, then explain to me why Hot 92.3 is in the market? By your logic, hispanics do not like Urban AC because it is too R&B then why are they listening to Hot 92.3? That is what they play...........R&B...period. And they report themselves to the industry trades as an URBAN AC formatted station and that is what they are. So according to your logic, since Hispanics do not like R&B, then Hot 92.3 needs to go away as well. Oh snap....the station has been above a 2 as well for several books. Format oversaturation and not targeting blacks AND hispanics was RO's problem period.....the 8% you like to equate as being not important, was listening to everyone else, not V-100.

Simple distinction. 92.3 researches and programs predominantly to Hispanics, with Black and Other secondary. That is why the audience is about 2/3 Hispanic, and the Black composition is only a little more than the "other." In other words, like Power 106 and KIIS, KHHT is predominantly an Hispanic station. The music is selected principally for it's Hispanic appeal, and obviously nothing that is not liked by that group will be played no matter how well it does in the Black audience. As I said, what works in LA is a coalition type format where music that has common or similar appeal to several ethnic groups is played, and unless the songs are crossovers, they are not.

KRBV attempted to be a totally Black focused station. KRBV was about 80% black, with the remaining tiny amount divided among Hispanics and Other. It was not a coalition, and had to take its audience from the roughly 8 total shares available to Black focused stations.

Trades make the format distinctions for reporting; most of us don't really care what the format is called but do know who are target is. KHHR is very much more thythmic than R&B and the so-called R&B songs are pretty much crossovers.

The white population has dropped drastically and is shrinking faster than any other group in LA (funny how no one mentions that here)

"Other" population 12+ in LA 1998 5,433,000 and in 2007 it is 5,629,000.
Black 12+ was 831,000 in 1998 and is 831,000 now.

Other, of course includes anyone not Black or Hispanic...so some of the growth is Asian. But the Black population is declining... even more if you take it as a percentage of total population.

but there is still room for a country station in this market, not but five stations offering some sort of country product in thier playlists like the situation we have with R&B and in particular, old school R&B. Yes there is room for Urban AC in LA on one station maybe two at most.

No, there is, as there always was, room for perhaps one Black-only station. In this case, the community orientation and the image and reputation of KJLH will win. The Beat won when it did the no color line approach. KRBV has and had no hope as a Black (only) AC because there are not enough Blacks who like that format to make it work.

KRBV was, in Fall, in 12+ the #1 Black station with nearly a 13 share. It was followed very, very closely by KTWV (which many consider to be more of a Black AC than KRBV ever was), Power, KJLH and KHHT with KDAY, KFI and KIIS following and KTLK and KOST rounding out the top 10 and accounting for about 73% of all Black listening. Also note that, of those 73 share, about 37 are going to coalition or general market stations (Power, 92.3, KOST, KFI, KTWV, etc.). In other words, of about 8 Black total market shares, only something like 35% is going to stations specifically targeted at Black audiences such as KDAY, KRBV and KJLH. That means there is at least one station to many with this non-coalition, no color line approach. I agree with you, though, that Radio One was not smart enough to see this... ultimately causing them to lose about $260 million on the sale price of KRBV.
 
2djdramah said:
If "coalition audiences are the choice" in this market then explain why a station would call themselves "latino 96.3?" just from that name I don't even want to listen even though I like reggaeton. I don't recall RO naming their station "black 100.3"

I perhaps should have clarified the obvious for you.

The market is 42% Hispanic. In 18-34 it is 55% Hispanic. Blacks are 8% and, excluding Asians and recent immigrants who are not Hispanic or Asian (Persians, Arabs, Russians, etc.) the market is only about 25% or less non-Hispanic White.

The group that is made up of an hispanic majority, 18-34, can easily support multiple stations that cater only to an Hispanic audience. No other group in LA is large enough to create a major player from a single ethnic group. Keep in mind that stations in Spanish get over 30 shares 18-34 and around 26 of them in 25-54.

As to names, remember that "Hispanic" is not a race or ethnicity... it is a culture.
 
DavidEduardo said:

That means there is at least one station to many with this non-coalition, no color line approach. I agree with you, though, that Radio One was not smart enough to see this... ultimately causing them to lose about $260 million on the sale price of KRBV.

^^^That is what still gets me about RO. They had a good thing and just ruined KKBT and made it worse with KRBV. They made blunder after blunder after blunder with 100.3. Again, I am just glad they are out of this market. I have heard ROs stations in Atlanta, St. Louis, Dallas-Ft. Worth and Charlotte, I just wonder who long it will be before they sell those stations. And even in their home turf, DC, WHUR is just stellar compared to ROs stations. Not being a hater, I am just sick of corporations such as RO killing off great radio stations.... :mad:
 
In my hometown of louisville ky radio one made a mess ruined a heritage rock staion wlrs but thankfully they sold all there properties here last year. Main line broadcasting bought them and yook over in october and now has to fix them. Radio one should be banned from radio. they just never seemed to care here.
 
DavidEduardo said:
2djdramah said:
I also agree but IMO V-100 was never a good station and it could have been for the LA market but Radio One not only did not know how to appeal to hispanics, they also did not know how to appeal to blacks in LA as well. There are too many other choices to hear R&B in LA and they offered nothing different or special. Plus, they made a lot of mistakes and turned off a lot of thier audience when they came into LA.

Whether V 100 was a good urban AC or not is not the issue. There is just not enough audience for an urban AC in LA.

Look at the analytical hiararchy: LA is only abut 8% Black. Not all Blacks like urban AC. Backs listen to everything from urban and smooth jazz to KNX, too. Hispanics in the Southwest as a rule do not like urban AC at all (it's too r&b). The potential share for a 25-44 targeted urban AC is, thus, well below a 2.

This is a lot like the much discussed country format. KKGO may not be a perfect implementation, but it is the only one. If it were really good, it might get 0.2 or 0.3 shares more. But there is no more milk in that cow than abou a 1.5 to 1.6 average in LA.

Urban AC just can not be justified here. The bad decision was to stick with an "all Black appeal" format in a amrket where coalition audiences are the choice. Look at what Harold Austin, who is Hispanic, did with the Beat in the "no color lines" era!

As a 52 year old non-hispanic gringo, I sometimes resent the population and demographics changes that have happened in southern cal over the last 50 years (I have lived here since 1958). Of course such feelings are common among other older ethnic demos when they find themselves suddenly in the minority. But in spite of that, I have ended up finding myself agreeing with David more than disagreeing with him. The hispanic/spanish speaking demo is here, they are the majority audience. The major problem here in so cal is there are TOO MANY radio stations and too few demographic groups for them to appeal to. Do the math.
 
2djdramah said:
DavidEduardo said:

That means there is at least one station to many with this non-coalition, no color line approach. I agree with you, though, that Radio One was not smart enough to see this... ultimately causing them to lose about $260 million on the sale price of KRBV.

^^^That is what still gets me about RO. They had a good thing and just ruined KKBT and made it worse with KRBV. They made blunder after blunder after blunder with 100.3. Again, I am just glad they are out of this market. I have heard ROs stations in Atlanta, St. Louis, Dallas-Ft. Worth and Charlotte, I just wonder who long it will be before they sell those stations. And even in their home turf, DC, WHUR is just stellar compared to ROs stations. Not being a hater, I am just sick of corporations such as RO killing off great radio stations.... :mad:

I have been beating my head against the same wall with David and others on here. Yes, there are a large number of radio stations but they are all going to chase the prime demographics of age and ethnicity. Since people in our group (I have ten more years than you) are going to be left out. I for one would love to have an adult standards (Like "The Lounge" on 570, then 690 or 1260 before News Talk), I would also like a "real oldies" station playing the music for my generation. At least for now we do have a fairly decent country station again.

The answer for me was to take my computer that I just recently replaced with a faster machine, outfit it to hook into my stereo and enjoy the stations that stream on the web. Maybe once the digital radio thing sorts out and HD radios become affordable some of the less attractive (to the ad agencies) formats can get back on the air. Probably not though because once they have enough potential listeners they will chase the attractive demos for that as well. But there is also satellite as an option if you can get past the idea of paying for radio, I had to for TV.

As to Radio One. I think they are just poor managers overall. They are continually bailing themselves out by selling stations. Eventually they will just dwindle and disappear altogether.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom