> I've said it before..there's nothing wrong with a show being
> brokered. And just because a show is brokered doesn't make
> it a poorly produced show. (many are, but being a broker
> doesn't automatically mean you suck)
>
> Look at it this way. A broker takes control over his
> revenue. He can make as little or as much as he/she may
> wants after paying the bills. If the hourly rate is $100 and
> the host has a three hour a day show, if they have $50 per
> spot rates and have 10 spots per hour....you do the math.
> It's NOT a bad business model. Even if so someone sucks on
> air, if they are good at sales, or hires someone who is,
> there is good money to be made.
It is a bad business model... unless you're using the show to promote your business. You're not going to sell the spots for more than the station can get for them. If they could sell spots in that hour, they wouldn't sell the hour to you.
Those who succeed at brokering often have to resort to questionable tactics.
In the Tampa area, there is a sports talk show, hosted by a man who has padded his resume with a nonexistent NFL career while leaving out a considerable rap sheet. He has kept his show on the air on the lowest-rent station in town for years by overrepresenting his audience size and underdelivering on promises to small, naive advertisers (such as floral shops) where the owners don't understand radio. He sounds terrible and survives only by conning sponsors, leaving these businesses with a bad taste toward anyone trying to sell them radio time.
If someone sucks on air, and manages to talk a few suckers into buying time,
then the station and the listeners take a hit. The listeners can go to satellite, internet and other media. Now is not the time to give them another reason to leave.
Some markets (Jacksonville FL for example) have been ruled by time-brokers who have lousy shows but are great salesmen. That's a big reason no station has ever challenged WOKV for dominance in the talk format.
> It shouldn't matter. All it means is the station has less
> control over the production value and content of the show.
>
Walter Sabo has a great point about this. If someone paid you to put polkas on Friday night at 7 p.m. on a music station, you wouldn't, because it would screw up the cume. Some talk PDs are like paint-by-numbers artists compared to real artists. Just plug in the shows, fill up the holes. Otherwise they would care that the sound they have worked so hard to develop is being mangled by some brokered clown saying "duh, AM... uh radio, uh KXXX 1720" instead of "Newstalk 1720, KXXX, your News Leader in the Great Wash!" Why are the rules different for talk stations? Why is it OK for talk stations to suck two days a week?