• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Boortz Says He's Staying At Least 4 Years

WSB must be breathing a sigh of relief. First, Clark Howard decided not to run for mayor. Then yesterday, Boortz said he's staying through Obama's time as president. When someone asked, "Eight more years?", Boortz said he wouldn't be surprised if it's just 4 years.

It's interesting...I watch the regular news, and people talk like the sky has fallen but Obama offers hope. I listen to people like Boortz, Hannity and Savage, and they predict what's already happened is nowhere as terrible as what they predict will happen under Obama.
 
It's kind of a good news/bad news type of report. ;D

The bad news is, whether you are the station, the network, the co-workers, the advertisers or the listeners... we're stuck with that blow-hard, arrogant, wrapped-up-in-himself kind of guy.

The good news is, (for all of the stakeholders listed above) thank goodness we still have Boortz. We can only begin to image how bad, how inferior a replacement person might be. ::)
 
RoddyFreeman said:
WSB must be breathing a sigh of relief. First, Clark Howard decided not to run for mayor. Then yesterday, Boortz said he's staying through Obama's time as president. When someone asked, "Eight more years?", Boortz said he wouldn't be surprised if it's just 4 years.

It's interesting...I watch the regular news, and people talk like the sky has fallen but Obama offers hope. I listen to people like Boortz, Hannity and Savage, and they predict what's already happened is nowhere as terrible as what they predict will happen under Obama.

That's because the regular news is devoid of reason and filled with emotion. They are ignorant of some of the most basic things with regard to how the economy works and the government's role in it. They are usually wrong in their observations. They are also griping about Obama after 3 days, because they can't get straight answers from a man who got elected on his mythology built up by the same "news" hacks who didn't bother to find anything out about him, or hold him to a standard of even a Bill Clinton. You get what you suck up to, I guess.
 
Curiosity question. Is the delivery of news that bad...... or is it you have a different opinion and understanding than the news people operate under?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom