• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Boston August ratings are in

http://******************/ratings.aspx?market=13

WROR's cume is now over a million (1,111,000)

No numbers for WHBA released
 
WEEI #8, WBZ-FM #12. WODS # 13 and cracking the 3s. WAAF # 15 and finally descends into the upper 1s.

-
 
freqlost said:
OP I can't view your link.
Where is the RadioDiscussions link ?
I don't see it at the top of the main page.

radiodiscussions.com/radioinfo.com are not currently posting ratings charts. I don't know whether they plan to (resume) in the future.

To see the ratings charts at the ****************** link above you have to register for a free account.
 
CTListener said:
Fenway1912 said:
No numbers for WHBA released

Meaning Clear Channel isn't paying for Arbitrons for this station?

The cluster pays so they're seeing the numbers, but Arbitron might not really be concerned about publicly releasing the numbers.
 
WHBA is listed under "Other Stations Located in Market". Suspect they either aren't yet encoding for PPM, or are wishing they had kept the WFNX format.
 
Signpost said:
WHBA is listed under "Other Stations Located in Market". Suspect they either aren't yet encoding for PPM, or are wishing they had kept the WFNX format.

You stunt with no commercials for 6 weeks to build a cume and then no report? WFNX had the encoding set up but stopped paying the last 2 months.

I would think Clear Channel has enough clout with Arbitron that encoding is not the issue.

Now could CC have requested a private report with no numbers released?

In Chicago the only thing Merlin has done right was putting alternative on a LPTV (Channel 6) and in 3 months have built a 800,000 cume
 
dumber than a box of hair said:
Signpost said:
Suspect they either aren't yet encoding for PPM

That would be wrong. They are encoding and they do show up in the PPM software numbers.

Correct...they are showing up and showing up lower than FNX. Pretty steady decline since the flip.
 
rockcaptain said:
Correct...they are showing up and showing up lower than FNX. Pretty steady decline since the flip.

I posted a plea for CC to keep the 'FNX format, arguing the signal would constrain anything they chose to air, and that WFNX's stream almost tying the terrestrial signal was an indication the station's popularity went beyond the signal's reach. The fact that "the Harbor" is having zero effect seems to validate my argument. If CC really wanted to monetize their investment they should have kept alternative rock on 101.7 and settled for the 1 share. Ironically, CC launched a new alt rocker in Cincinnati the week after they pulled the plug on the format in Boston.
 
rockcaptain said:
they are showing up and showing up lower than FNX. Pretty steady decline since the flip.

Precisely what is expected to happen after so abrupt a change...exactly the same thing that would have happened if WFNX had never existed in the first place. They're burning off the audience WFNX had, and it will take months if not years for new listeners to find WHBA and build the numbers back up.
 
Signpost said:
I posted a plea for CC to keep the 'FNX format, arguing the signal would constrain anything they chose to air, and that WFNX's stream almost tying the terrestrial signal was an indication the station's popularity went beyond the signal's reach. The fact that "the Harbor" is having zero effect seems to validate my argument. If CC really wanted to monetize their investment they should have kept alternative rock on 101.7 and settled for the 1 share.

Despite its small loyal following and its heritage, WFNX had unfortunately been a steady money loser for quite a while. CC wasn't going to continue that. I'm sure it made more sense to CC to eliminate staffing, payroll, and other operating expenses involved with running 101.7 as a live station and run it as a practically no-cost computer in a closet and no ratings than to continue to lose money for WFNX's 1 share.

I guess they could have continued an automated alternative rock format on it at little expense, but that would have just been a music jukebox without the local identification that WFNX's audience tuned in for. "The Harbor" will certainly never be a ratings monster, but I wouldn't be surprised if it eventually also ekes out a 1 share with a lot less overhead than WFNX had.
 
Eli Polonsky said:
Signpost said:
I posted a plea for CC to keep the 'FNX format, arguing the signal would constrain anything they chose to air, and that WFNX's stream almost tying the terrestrial signal was an indication the station's popularity went beyond the signal's reach. The fact that "the Harbor" is having zero effect seems to validate my argument. If CC really wanted to monetize their investment they should have kept alternative rock on 101.7 and settled for the 1 share.

Despite its small loyal following and its heritage, WFNX had unfortunately been a steady money loser for quite a while. CC wasn't going to continue that. I'm sure it made more sense to CC to eliminate staffing, payroll, and other operating expenses involved with running 101.7 as a live station and run it as a practically no-cost computer in a closet and no ratings than to continue to lose money for WFNX's 1 share.

I guess they could have continued an automated alternative rock format on it at little expense, but that would have just been a music jukebox without the local identification that WFNX's audience tuned in for. "The Harbor" will certainly never be a ratings monster, but I wouldn't be surprised if it eventually also ekes out a 1 share with a lot less overhead than WFNX had.

They were not 'losing' money - the books were cooked as the Mindich family was on the payroll.


The bigger problem is the paper itself is dying and nobody wants to buy it. The adult phone biz has dried up.

Mindich sold WFNX because it was the only thing that had value outside the property on Brookline Ave which he is also unloading.
 
If was so expensive to staff WFNX, how is The Globe affording it?

Will the Radio BDC stream be measured by Arbitron? Would they be allowed to be?

I'll say again that Radio BDC sounds great. It sounds more mature than WFNX did and is not as boring and repetitive and stuck in the past as Radio 92.9. It would be interesting to see how many people are currently streaming Radio BDC vs. WFNX.com.
 
promixcuous said:
If was so expensive to staff WFNX, how is The Globe affording it?

Will the Radio BDC stream be measured by Arbitron? Would they be allowed to be?

I'll say again that Radio BDC sounds great. It sounds more mature than WFNX did and is not as boring and repetitive and stuck in the past as Radio 92.9. It would be interesting to see how many people are currently streaming Radio BDC vs. WFNX.com.
Have them both subscribe and we'll see. I'd also be curious to see how both streams are doing.
 
Boston/Re: Boston August ratings are in

promixcuous said:
If was so expensive to staff WFNX, how is The Globe affording it?

Will the Radio BDC stream be measured by Arbitron? Would they be allowed to be?

I'll say again that Radio BDC sounds great. It sounds more mature than WFNX did and is not as boring and repetitive and stuck in the past as Radio 92.9. It would be interesting to see how many people are currently streaming Radio BDC vs. WFNX.com.
Have them both subscribe and we'll see. I'd also be curious to see how both streams are doing.
 
dumber than a box of hair said:
rockcaptain said:
they are showing up and showing up lower than FNX. Pretty steady decline since the flip.

Precisely what is expected to happen after so abrupt a change...exactly the same thing that would have happened if WFNX had never existed in the first place. They're burning off the audience WFNX had, and it will take months if not years for new listeners to find WHBA and build the numbers back up.

Not going to happen. Numbers will not go back up. You cannot have a mainstream format on such a limited signal. With a signal like that you need to niche program.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom