• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Boston Globe takes a hard look at Channel 25 woes

Never realized impressions were based on 2+ numbers in TV
You can get multiple demos, similar to radio. But Nielsen measures 2+ for TV because of channels like Disney and PBS Kids that target young children.

The real thing to look at are the 25-54 numbers, where you'll see a total of about 58,000 prime age adults counted as watching the late local news. That's well under 5% of the total market in that age group watching any of the late local newscasts.
 
NBC doesn't care as they have similar trainwrecks in Philly, San Diego and San Francisco.
Is Philly considered a trainwreck? I thought NBC owned WCAU was a solid #2 in the ratings. Not realistic to become #1 when WPVI’s Action News has been #1 since the 1970s.
 
For those who want the TL;DR version...

Total viewers in June 2024:
  1. WCVB Channel 5 (ABC)
  2. WBZ Channel 4 (CBS)
  3. WHDH Channel 7 (Ind)
  4. WFXT Channel 25 (FOX)
  5. WBTS Channel 15 (NBC)
They omitted WMUR since they're N.H.-based.

Is anyone surprised honestly? Because I'm not.
 
For those who want the TL;DR version...

Total viewers in June 2024:
  1. WCVB Channel 5 (ABC)
  2. WBZ Channel 4 (CBS)
  3. WHDH Channel 7 (Ind)
  4. WFXT Channel 25 (FOX)
  5. WBTS Channel 15 (NBC)
They omitted WMUR since they're N.H.-based.

Is anyone surprised honestly? Because I'm not.

Channel 5 is wiping the floor clean with everyone else! It's not even close.

The other thing this data tells me:
The local TV news business is dying - at least in terms of linear viewing. A massive portion of the population does not tune in when adding all the stations together.

The downward spiral of WFXT began in 2013 when Cox's Bay Area station made a mistake that destroyed its credibility with the large Asian population in that market.


FOX had long wanted a Bay Area O&O because of the NFC 49ers and in 2014 they traded Boston and Memphis for Oakland. WFXT managers went to California and the Cox Oakland managers came to Boston.

Cox decided Maria Stephanos made too much money and let her walk.


The Ansin family controls the narrative. They will never agree to Fox branding on local news and it has worked in Miami. WFXT has no leverage at this point.
 
In 15 of the top 16 TV markets, Fox owns and operates their affiliate.

The one market that they don't: Boston.

Why is this?
 
NBC doesn't care as they have similar trainwrecks in Philly, San Diego and San Francisco.
Also, I thought KNSD was a respectable #2 behind KFMB.

You might be thinking Hartford-New Haven, where I believe WVIT is #3 behind much-dominant WFSB and closer to second-place WTNH.
 
When Cox took over WFXT, that was the beginning of the end of its newscast. If Fox was smart, at the time they lost ownership in Boston, they should have affiliated with WHDH which has a strong news operation. That would have been perfect timing when NBC left Channel 7. I'm sure NBC regrets getting NBC 10 Boston which is a ratings disaster.
 
If Fox was smart, at the time they lost ownership in Boston, they should have affiliated with WHDH which has a strong news operation.

But most of the value of WFXT was tied to the network affiliation and the deal never would have happened without that Fox affiliation coming with the TV station.
 
In 15 of the top 16 TV markets, Fox owns and operates their affiliate.

The one market that they don't: Boston.

Why is this?
Fox wanted more revenue from the 49ers and Seahawks games this factors in why Fox left Boston for San Francisco and Seattle. This in turn is how KCPQ and KTVU were converted from Fox Contract affiliates to Fox owned stations.
 
In 15 of the top 16 TV markets, Fox owns and operates their affiliate.od

The one market that they don't: Boston.

Why is this?
It's complicated. WFXT is the largest Fox affiliate by market size that is not owned and operated by the network, although it was previously owned by Fox on two occasions (1987–1990 and 1995–2014).

Murdoch also owned the Boston Herald and was unable to get an FCC waiver to own a newspaper and TV station. He wound up 'selling' the Herald to a loyal employee to get the TV station back but everybody in town knew he still controlled the paper.

When KTVU imploded in 2013 FOX pounced but they had to deal with as a group owner they could not exceed 39% of total US homes. If they added San Francisco they had to cut another market.
 
Fox wanted more revenue from the 49ers and Seahawks games this factors in why Fox left Boston for San Francisco and Seattle. This in turn is how KCPQ and KTVU were converted from Fox Contract affiliates to Fox owned stations.
Ironically, last season there were *five* Patriots games that aired on Fox.

This season, they're scheduled to have six Fox games! This is, of course, barring any schedule changes.

When WFXT was a Fox O&O, they only got two Patriots regular season games per year.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom