formeraa said:
Of course, this was a city that thought a black guy had jumped into a car and murdered a pregnant white woman. Never mind that the car was going the wrong way in the wrong neighborhood and it was nearly impossible for the alleged event to have happened based on the story as told. And that went on for months before they found that the husband had murdered his wife...
Oh please, Boston is one of the safest and most well-educated big cities in the US. In other cities (Philly, Detroit, Atlanta come to mind), a whole city probably wouldn't have been so taken with a single murder case when hundreds happen every year. Besides, you had to go back like 18 years for that one.
Face it, at the minimum, the electronic signs should never have been posted without the permission of (and/or payment to) the owner of each location. Because they were in places where they didn't belong - and located in some of the most crucial transportation hubs of the city - this was a big deal. The city of Boston had to act and they did so appropriately. Mind you, I am generally a harsh critic of most political decisions made in Mass. But they got it right this time.
I don't know where they were placed in other cities, so that could have been a factor. For example, I don't know that the little boards were found in train stations in other cities. Perhaps the guys in charge of placement in Boston were a little too "imaginative" for their own good.
But, I do think that this criticism of Boston over this issue is absurd. If you were familiar with Boston, you saw the list of where these devices were located, and you saw how they were mounted, you wouldn't be making these silly comments bashing Beantown.
CN's campaign was dumb. It's as simple as that.