• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Boston's Black Radio War !

WILD has a lot of things going against it, being AM Daytime only is one of them, but for years and years it managed to have a faithful following, even when it was off the air at 4:15PM.

Technology has changed, with IPods and internet streaming potentially taking listeners away, along with bigger fish stealing what was traditionally their audience.

In my opinion, the one thing that will keep WILD from regaining even a percentage point of it's former glory is lack of revenue. With 24/7 pirate operations out there selling ads targeting the same audience, probably for less money, and certainly with less overhead (those pesky taxes, filing fees, workman's comp, FICA contributions, transmitter site leases, ASCAP/BMI fees, etc) how do you expect a small legitimate station to compete with the pirate radio stations you are so supportive of?

The same argument can be made for why Greater Media,Entercom or anyone else won't flip to the urban format you desire so much. The target advertisers are already being courted by someone else, or many someone elses, without the same costs and delivering the same audience.

You can't have it both ways. The costs of playing by the rules are brutal. I don't know what Radio-One paid to move onto the 1430 tower at Wellington Station when they lost their tower site up the street to "Telecom City" or what ever they are calling it this week. I don't know what they are paying CC for rent for tower space and a spot for the transmitter, engineering services, keeping a phone line in the C.O.L., maintaining a main studio staffed during normal business hours as required by F.C.C. regulations, etc etc etc.

I don't divulge much about where I work, but it is small operation, our numbers are down, just like everyone elses. My hours have been reduced. We pay commercial rates for studio's in a commercially zoned building. We pay for tower space, phone and data lines to transmitter sites, phone lines to comply with FCC requirements, staffing levels as required by the F.C.C., also they paid for engineering to move the transmitter site and all the legalese to move the C.O.L. for one station, then there was the check they wrote Alex Langer to buy the license.
Sometimes I wonder how the people in NYC who own the place manage to keep the lights on. I can't imagine that Radio-One is in better shape than MRBI. Why Radio-One doesn't just walk away from 1090 and let it go dark is beyond me.
 
MRBIboredop said:
You can't have it both ways. The costs of playing by the rules are brutal. I don't know what Radio-One paid to move onto the 1430 tower at Wellington Station when they lost their tower site up the street to "Telecom City" or what ever they are calling it this week. I don't know what they are paying CC for rent for tower space and a spot for the transmitter, engineering services, keeping a phone line in the C.O.L., maintaining a main studio staffed during normal business hours as required by F.C.C. regulations, etc etc etc.

One company--whether it's MRBI, CCU, Beasley, or someone else--should own 1430 and 1470. And the two stations should simulcast. Their day and night coverage is quite complementary and together. the two signals could compete with 1330 or 1600. Here's a thought: Birach, the company that seems to have a thing for unusually engineered AMs. I guess Birach also specializes in Arabic programming, but I strongly doubt whether they do Arabic at all of their stations. Two of Birach's technically anomalous stations are WNZK, the US's only dual-frequency AM, and WTOR, which covers virtually no area or population in the US but puts quite good signal into its target market, which is Toronto, on the opposite shore of Lake Ontario. WNZK serves the Detroit area's large Arabic-speaking population; WTOR is multi-ethnic, I believe.
 
MRBIboredop said:
WILD has a lot of things going against it, being AM Daytime only is one of them, but for years and years it managed to have a faithful following, even when it was off the air at 4:15PM.

I would think the best thing RadioOne could do is donate it to GBH, BUR or Emerson College.

R1 would get the tax break for the donation....and GBH, BUR or Emerson would get a station they could put alternative programs on...maybe even some black oriented programs. (I know GBH has in the past wanted to add more black-oriented programming in the past.)

WILD, while a daytimer, is licensed to Boston....and has a strong signal all over the city. I think GBH-BUR or Emerson could program it with some worthwhile stuff.

They wouldn't have to worry about ratings & ad revenue that would always be atrocious because of it's daytimer status.
 
MRBIboredop said:
how do you expect a small legitimate station to compete with the pirate radio stations you are so supportive of?

By complaining loudly to the FCC?

Garrett said:
rapking said:
Its time for someone to Purchase Wild-AM 1090 and re-create WILD-FM . OK . Unless Radio One stop being a Slumlord and put money into 1090 ( not going to happen ) or sell 1090 or F.C.C. shutdown Touch-FM ( Not going to happen GOOD ), WILD-AM 1090 will FAIL . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzIN7UOQbB8&feature=related

Awe c'mon.
Really?

::)

What's particularly amusing is the implication that blacks in the communities mentioned only listen to WILD or Touch, as if no black people in those areas would dare to listen to any non-urban station such as, say, WBOS, Kiss 108, WGBH, WBUR, or WCRB (to name a few).

Of course, the pro-WILD argument on the YouTube page (well, the text... the audio is unlistenable to me) isn't helped by its support of Al "race-baiter" Sharpton.
 
I would think the best thing RadioOne could do is donate it to GBH, BUR or Emerson College.

Why would any of them take it? A daytimer AM has the same operating costs and problems for a college owner that it would for a commercial owner. Look what happened to WBTN up in Bennington!

And I think if anything WILD is only valuable to a SMALL college signal, not a big one. Only a small signal would see benefit from the larger reach, even though it's only during the day. But that limits the field to WBRS, WRBB, WMLN, WMFO and maybe WZLY, WDJM or WMWM. AFAIK, none of those stations is set up with the proper mission, format, programming or budget to take advantage of a decent-sized daytime-only AM signal.

FWIW, not long ago I took a hard look at whether a commercial station would have more value as a tax write-off than as an operating station. You've got to get your costs pretty far up and your revenues pretty far down, before donating for tax benefits start making sense...and even a limited signal like WILD's shouldn't be getting that far down. Radio is still a cash printing machine for a lot of owners; it's just that many of these owners have such incredible debt loads that even a cash machine can't keep up. And a tax write-off doesn't really help make debt payments.
 
::)
[/quote]

What's particularly amusing is the implication that blacks in the communities mentioned only listen to WILD or Touch, as if no black people in those areas would dare to listen to any non-urban station such as, say, WBOS, Kiss 108, WGBH, WBUR, or WCRB (to name a few).

Of course, the pro-WILD argument on the YouTube page (well, the text... the audio is unlistenable to me) isn't helped by its support of Al "race-baiter" Sharpton.

[/quote] I am from Roxbury and I know alot of folks from Roxbury, Dorchester and Mattapan listen to WEEI and Majic 106.7 ( Outside from Urban/Pirate formats ).
 
rapking said:
Don Juan said:
rapking said:
Unless Radio One stop being a Slumlord and put money into 1090...

What money? They don't have any. Don't you understand that?

NO Money ? SELL IT !!!

Couple of thoughts...

1.) Who wants to by an AM daytimer in Boston?

2.) It's possible that WILD gives RadioOne a little bit of return on it's dollar by airing R1 national spots in one of the top 10 markets. If this is the case, while they are in dire straits, every penny counts.
 
What else would one call the same individuals
who post the same thing every other week???
The "war" has long since ended... get over it,
and move on... ::)
 
[/quote]

NO Money ? SELL IT !!!

[/quote]

I heard that they may be asking more for it than anyone has been willing to offer.

[/quote] I believe that is true. Radio One need to come down on the sale tag on 1090 . The way Radio One is running this station now it's clearly Radio One dont want 1090.
 
rapking said:
rapking said:
rapking said:
NO Money ? SELL IT !!!

I heard that they may be asking more for it than anyone has been willing to offer.
I believe that is true. Radio One need to come down on the sale tag on 1090 . The way Radio One is running this station now it's clearly Radio One dont want 1090.

1.) Did you read my explanations as to why it may be more beneficial to them as a company to hold onto it, than sell it at a fire sale?

2.) Again I ask, who would want to purchase a daytimer in Boston (with no pre-sunrise authority?)? (And if they did sell it, do you think any of the programming would be black oriented?)
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom