Tom Wells said:konbaasiang said:If I attenuate 3dB to compensate for that distortion, mono content will be 3dB quiet.
I need a re-read on C-Quam theory but I do seem to remember there being a difference in mono loudness vs stereo loudness, and it may be the same 3 db you are finding.
This is true. For the stereo listener, stereo content will be louder, and mono content will be about 3db down. Of course, for the mono listeners everything will sound the same because mono is the only option. This processing system would add the maximum amount of peak limiting to the amplitude modulated main carrier (L+R) as well as to the phase modulated component 1+(L-R). And yes, when you combine the two you will get stereo audio that is louder and not as tightly peak controlled, resulting in a more naturalistic sound (not as clipped) with a wide stereo signal. The C-Quam receivers were designed with enough headroom to make it work. This is why AM stereo really jumps out at the listener.
I can see where this would present problems for a webcast encoder. It sure does work well with C-Quam though. I've often wondered about what the affect and or effect would be if employing this method on FM?
Thanks for tinkering!
-TR