Anyone have any ideas how to revive the Alternative Rock format in NYC? The nation's largest and greatest city is without a rock or alternative rock outlet?!Why?!
mrbrightside said:The ratings were low on K-Rock for a simple reason: a stale, stale playlist. The same 90's songs played over and over ad nauseum. How many times can you hear the same RHCP songs?
WRXP was just starting to gain traction when the plug was pulled for the .3 ratings station.
Jersey Maiden said:Another possible reason for K-Rock's downfall was their constant identity crisis. It's a good thing to change things up when it's clear something isn't working but do it too much and the strategy will backfire. Which brings me to another point; I loved the 2003-2005 period where they had a little bit of alternative, hard rock, metal, and even rap. As far I'm concerned, the 2005 flip was the beginning of the end. Personally, I'd love an alternative/active combo (which G-Rock also played) but that will probably never happen again.
mrbrightside said:Jersey Maiden said:Another possible reason for K-Rock's downfall was their constant identity crisis. It's a good thing to change things up when it's clear something isn't working but do it too much and the strategy will backfire. Which brings me to another point; I loved the 2003-2005 period where they had a little bit of alternative, hard rock, metal, and even rap. As far I'm concerned, the 2005 flip was the beginning of the end. Personally, I'd love an alternative/active combo (which G-Rock also played) but that will probably never happen again.
Speaking of identity crisis- hard rock, metal, and rap do not belong together on the same station. Go strictly alternative, or strictly active/hard rock. Playing both pleases no one (maybe you, no offense I hope).
Jersey Maiden said:As long as you don't ask me how someone could like their Deathcab with a side of Disturbed or say that I should be ashamed of it, there's no need to worry. I'm a realist and I know that an alternative leaning station has the best chance of surviving in New York. Which is fine since WDHA is already taking care of active.
Jersey Maiden said:I just want to know what kind of rap you mean. There are those who fall under the alternative umbrella (Beastie Boys and Rage) and those who simply rapped over a guitar riff that K-Rock favored (Jay-Z in 99 Problems, Eminem in Lose Yourself, and the Roots in Rockstar). But I have to give K-Rock credit for giving the Roots some exposure. When was the last time you heard them on hip hip stations?
Jersey Maiden said:Did find RXP's playlist too broad or not broad enough? Compared to defunct stations in the area, I really didn't think RXP covered as much ground. G-Rock, despite its claim as "your rock alternative" also played active rockers like Trapt. And I think I said enough about K-Rock. Sure AC/DC is hard rock but when it came to current music, RXP only played alternative. And then there are artists that get covered by both formats (Nirvana, Soundgarden, Pearl Jam to name a few). I found that WRFF makes more effort to play something different every day ("under the covers" in the morning and bonus track of the day in the late afternoon). Why oh why did RXP never play Sum 41, anyone from Drive Thru Records or 30 Seconds to Mars (ironically, RXP put up a concert album on their FB page last Thursday)?
mrbrightside said:RXP did a good job with the alternative, however, I did not not want to hear classic rock along with it. That's what Q is for.
TheBigA said:mrbrightside said:RXP did a good job with the alternative, however, I did not not want to hear classic rock along with it. That's what Q is for.
But at the end of the day, the census numbers bear out that alternative rock is a format for white males in the suburbs, which is why it's mainly found in NJ, Westchester, and LI.
MarcR said:That's patently untrue! The Alt-Rock format, on average, has an audience composition of 60% male and 40% female, the most gender-balanced of any of the Rock formats, which explains why it's still the most viable of the Rock formats. And I don't think 'RXP garnered its highest ratings when it played more classic rock, either.
TheBigA said:MarcR said:That's patently untrue! The Alt-Rock format, on average, has an audience composition of 60% male and 40% female, the most gender-balanced of any of the Rock formats, which explains why it's still the most viable of the Rock formats. And I don't think 'RXP garnered its highest ratings when it played more classic rock, either.
A 60% male format is a majority male format by definition. But either way, my point is it's a SUBURBAN format.
All press reports stated that RXP's final book, after it added classic rock, was its format high.
mrbrightside said:Last time I listened, it was mostly alternative, with fewer classic rock songs.
mrbrightside said:Rock is not a "SUBURBAN" format.
TheBigA said:Last time I listened, it was mostly alternative, with fewer classic rock songs.
Did you listen during the final two months?
TheBigA said:Listenership for alternative rock was mainly in the suburbs. Not in the five boroughs. The audience for classic rock and classic hits is much larger and more interested in hearing that music on OTA radio. The audience for alternative rock is smaller and has gone to other platforms like satellite and internet.
TheBigA said:The bigger problem for rock music is the lack of investment from record labels and from the music industry as a whole. Not from radio. The music industry needs to focus more on artist development and on promotion of great songs. That's mainly what's missing from new rock music.
mrbrightside said:I do not have the data to back up where rock was listened to. Do you? I'm not picking a fight, just wondering if that has been proven.
mrbrightside said:As far as going to the Internet and satellite, that was not by choice. It is the only place to hear the music.
TheBigA said:mrbrightside said:I do not have the data to back up where rock was listened to. Do you? I'm not picking a fight, just wondering if that has been proven.
There is a reason why there are multiple radio stations for rhythmic, urban, and tropical music, and it has to do with the population base in the five boroughs. Meanwhile, rock does very well in NJ, LI, and Westchester.
mrbrightside said:As far as going to the Internet and satellite, that was not by choice. It is the only place to hear the music.
Even in places where there is rock on the radio, fans of the music prefer very narrow internet stations where they can hear the specific mix of music they want. That is impractical for an OTA radio format.
mrbrightside said:Not exactly. Here in Philly, our 2 rock stations (both play new music) are in the top 10. I know NYC is not Philly, however, the audience is there.
TheBigA said:mrbrightside said:Philly is a very different market in terms of demographics and where the rock audience lives. And there really isn't much suburban radio except for Trenton or Wilmington.
Not true: You forgot about Reading and the Lehigh Valley.
Where I grew up (North Jersey) there were no suburban signals. Both of the Class B's in the area were religious. WDHA was static filled, and 107.1 was unlistenable due to The Breeze. If the NYC FMs were meant to serve only New York City, they would not be so powerful. They were meant to serve the NY & metro.
mrbrightside said:TheBigA said:mrbrightside said:Philly is a very different market in terms of demographics and where the rock audience lives. And there really isn't much suburban radio except for Trenton or Wilmington.
Not true: You forgot about Reading and the Lehigh Valley.
Where I grew up (North Jersey) there were no suburban signals. Both of the Class B's in the area were religious. WDHA was static filled, and 107.1 was unlistenable due to The Breeze. If the NYC FMs were meant to serve only New York City, they would not be so powerful. They were meant to serve the NY & metro.
TheBigA said:Philly is a very different market in terms of demographics and where the rock audience lives. And there really isn't much suburban radio except for Trenton or Wilmington.
mrbrightside said:Not true: You forgot about Reading and the Lehigh Valley.
mrbrightside said:If the NYC FMs were meant to serve only New York City, they would not be so powerful. They were meant to serve the NY & metro.