• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Broadcasting And Cable Article On "My TV"

J

Joseph_Gallant

Guest
Broadcasting and Cable.com has an article (registration may be required) on the new look of WZMY-50 (formerly WNDS).

Interestingly enough, the article makes no mention of WZMY being a New Hampshire station; instead, it's referred to as a "Boston" station throughout.

While I think WZMY did a good idea in moving their early-evening newscast to 7:30 P.M. (which will catch many commuters, especially in New Hampshire, who do not come home in time to watch other local early-evening newscasts), I think they may be making a mistake by running Ellen DeGeneres' talk/variety show at 8 P.M.

I can see where WZMY co-owner/manager Diane Sutter got the idea from: In the 1970's and early 1980's, the Metromedia independents ran Merv Griffin's talk show in prime-time. In New York, Merv on Metromedia's WNEW-5 (8:30-10 P.M. weeknights, IIRC) usually got far more viewers than any other independent station and sometimes was competitive with first-run network shows.

While I also have to applaud WZMY for trying to be innovate with the local "My TV Prime" from 9 to 10 P.M., I have doubts that the show could work in prime time.

I believe WZMY would get better ratings with movies from 8 to 10 P.M., especially if they could upgrade their movie library.

What the new owners should really do is to buy WMFP-62, build a new facility with new equipment in Boston, use WMFP as the primary station and WZMY as a satellite of WMFP. I believe there are some areas in the Boston market south of the city where WZMY is not on any cable system, but WMFP is. By buying WMFP, they'd get on cable through the full market, and be able to have a studio facility much closer to (and if they want to, inside of) Boston, which might lead to better guests for local programs.

One thing in the article that will cause consternation among bowlers: The article referred to candlepin bowling as "'Duckpin' In Other Areas". Duckpins and Candlepins are not the same. Duckpins are small, fat pins and not as tall as Tenpins; Candlepins are skinny but about the same height as Tenpins. I believe both do use the same size bowling balls, but otherwise, there are no similarities.

But the article did conclude by claiming that the bowling show would be brought back at an unspecified future date with women's and junior competitions as well as men's matches.
 
May be you should've waited to write your thoughts and comments
before actually watching the first (no)show. Their inagural news
segement was embarassing because of countless technical problems.
Camera work was absolutely painful(do they have college interns
working there?). The weather guy is a super freak. He's gotta go.
Their new local show never came on without any explanation. Instead
they ran Ellen's talk show. What gives? This station/format is
like a bad sitcom. Al Bundy must be the program director there.

> Broadcasting and Cable.com has an article (registration may
> be required) on the new look of WZMY-50 (formerly WNDS).
>
> Interestingly enough, the article makes no mention of WZMY
> being a New Hampshire station; instead, it's referred to as
> a "Boston" station throughout.
>
> While I think WZMY did a good idea in moving their
> early-evening newscast to 7:30 P.M. (which will catch many
> commuters, especially in New Hampshire, who do not come home
> in time to watch other local early-evening newscasts), I
> think they may be making a mistake by running Ellen
> DeGeneres' talk/variety show at 8 P.M.
>
> I can see where WZMY co-owner/manager Diane Sutter got the
> idea from: In the 1970's and early 1980's, the Metromedia
> independents ran Merv Griffin's talk show in prime-time. In
> New York, Merv on Metromedia's WNEW-5 (8:30-10 P.M.
> weeknights, IIRC) usually got far more viewers than any
> other independent station and sometimes was competitive with
> first-run network shows.
>
> While I also have to applaud WZMY for trying to be innovate
> with the local "My TV Prime" from 9 to 10 P.M., I have
> doubts that the show could work in prime time.
>
> I believe WZMY would get better ratings with movies from 8
> to 10 P.M., especially if they could upgrade their movie
> library.
>
> What the new owners should really do is to buy WMFP-62,
> build a new facility with new equipment in Boston, use WMFP
> as the primary station and WZMY as a satellite of WMFP. I
> believe there are some areas in the Boston market south of
> the city where WZMY is not on any cable system, but WMFP is.
> By buying WMFP, they'd get on cable through the full market,
> and be able to have a studio facility much closer to (and if
> they want to, inside of) Boston, which might lead to better
> guests for local programs.
>
> One thing in the article that will cause consternation among
> bowlers: The article referred to candlepin bowling as
> "'Duckpin' In Other Areas". Duckpins and Candlepins are not
> the same. Duckpins are small, fat pins and not as tall as
> Tenpins; Candlepins are skinny but about the same height as
> Tenpins. I believe both do use the same size bowling balls,
> but otherwise, there are no similarities.
>
> But the article did conclude by claiming that the bowling
> show would be brought back at an unspecified future date
> with women's and junior competitions as well as men's
> matches.
>
 
> May be you should've waited to write your thoughts and
> comments
> before actually watching the first (no)show. Their inagural
> news
> segement was embarassing because of countless technical
> problems.
> Camera work was absolutely painful(do they have college
> interns
> working there?).

Maybe YOU should do a little research before you make comments. You don't know the whole situation. Before you go on a bashing spree because of technical issues, let me ask you this. Have you ever been in a TV station that has undergone a major change? My guess from the hasty comments is "no". Now if the shoddy camera work kept up and the issues kept up, then I'd think there is something to comment on, but not yet.
 
> Maybe YOU should do a little research before you make
> comments. You don't know the whole situation. Before you go
> on a bashing spree because of technical issues, let me ask
> you this. Have you ever been in a TV station that has
> undergone a major change? My guess from the hasty comments
> is "no". Now if the shoddy camera work kept up and the
> issues kept up, then I'd think there is something to comment
> on, but not yet.
>
Some of the technical problems (such as overmodulated sound and running the wrong show) predate the switchover. The new master control board hasn't seem to fix that end of the problem. Too many people saw it, and many of them won't be back.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom