• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Business Strategy - WXRK HD-2 A case study

In his article, "Creating Competitive Advantage", Pankaj Ghemawat (a Harvard Business School professor), claims that the only way to create value is to do something unique that cannot be duplicated by the network of suppliers, customers, and competitors that also participate in the industry.

From its inception, until about November of last year, WXRK HD-2 provided a very unique product, which, while arguably could have been replaced by an extremely music-knowledgeable person with inexhaustible finds and a large iPod, was largely irreplaceable. There was no overlap between what K-Rock(2) had to offer and what its competitors (in the broadcasting/streaming business) had to offer.

Since the departure of the Fresh102 morning team and the flip of the WAQY HD-2 station to active rock, WXRK has been de-differentiating itself. It has been playing Creed and 3 Days Grace and Sick Puppies on one side and crap like the New Radicals on the other. Now, to me, these actions seem to be to "fend off" Q-HD2 and WRXP. Problem is, that by introducing playlist overlap, it is destroying its own value proposition: WXRK's product is becoming less unique, a move which increases the competitive forces of rivalry and threat of substitution.

On the flip side, the argument can be made that these same forces are being forced on Q-HD2 and WRXP, destroying those stations’ value propositions. The trouble with this strategy, is the while devaluing the competition, it destroys the greatest component for any firm operating in an industry, the relationship with the customer network; by commoditizing the product, the strategy encourages the existing customer to seek out the commoditized service from any other service provider. A superior strategy would be to invest in the asset, to differentiate the playlist, and to slowly try to grow the customer base through alternate means.
 
As a footnote, K-Rock(2), when it was better differentiated, was a darling of this board, a biased sample, but biased coservatively in that board contriibutors tend to complain about anything remotely distasteful. A fact which leaves me to imagine the average listener was floored with the quality of the product on K-Rock(2). Perhaps the broader public still is, and perhaps the Angsty-Metal acts are part of a pay-for-play program. The point is, less differentiation = diminished relationships.
 
It's not even just the nu-metal that's the problem for me, but the fact that they seem to update the playlist maybe once a month (and it's usually a minor update at that). But I guess you can't expect CBS to put a lot of effort into something that has 10 listeners...
 
The decision to broadcast the HD channels isn't a business decision on a local level. It's a weird commitment to HD radio that was made by the parent company. In other words, I can't imagen that anyone on CBS or Clear Channel gives a crap about what is on their HD channels.
 
mjb1124 said:
you can't expect CBS to put a lot of effort into something that has 10 listeners...

In his article, "Industry Transformation," Michael Porter suggests that industries faced with radical transformation, similar to that faced by the broadcast/streaming industry given the reduction of barrier of entry and increase in rivalry brought on by the Internet need to experiment with different products and channels. The logic to this strategy, boils down to the thought that if you buy enough lottery tickets, one will eventually hit: the HD radio market may be small now, and Internet is not in cars, yet. But what happens when it is?

Does CBS Radio want to put its entire brand at risk because it was easier, not even necessarily cheaper, just less work, to ignore a unique line of business? It seems so shortsighted to me. Clearly, K-Rock(2) is just one piece of a much larger portfolio of business at CBS, but all those business stem from the same competence, and neglecting one of those business puts the entire competence at risk.
 
This can also be extended to apply to how Pulse 87 offered a unique format not available anywhere else on FM radio.
 
Nick said:
Pulse 87 offered a unique format not available anywhere else on FM radio.

And they had decent cumes...

Their problem was the delivery system rather than the product. But a great example of how differentiation equals ratings gold.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom