"Cambridge SoundWorks Radio 820HD"
"Sound quality nitpicks aside, the real problem with the Cambridge SoundWorks Radio 820HD is the same issue that afflicts all HD Radio products: HD Radio technology hasn't yet distinguished itself as a worthwhile added value. To our ears, the HD Radio stations weren't delivering a dramatic improvement over their analog counterparts. And while we welcomed the presence of digital-only HD2 stations on the dial, many of them seemed to be noticeably compressed--more MP3 than CD. Moreover, the data streams seemed limited to artist, song, and show title info. That's nice, but nothing that can't be done with RDS info on analog stations, and many of the HD stations seem to lack the informational displays altogether. While the digital stations certainly offer static-free reception, that's only if they're within range; a distant HD station will drop in and out if it's too far away. Even more disturbing is that some nearby HD stations seem to blink out randomly--the cell phone-like signal meter drops a full six bars to zero and then shoots back up again a few seconds later, even when the radio is completely stationary. To reiterate, none of these problems are the fault of Cambridge 820HD. The same issues exist on the Polk I-Sonic, and will continue to exist for any and all HD Radio receivers until the stations decide to offer more bandwidth and better data support. While the HD Radio issues aren't particular to the 820HD, they're certainly a factor to weigh when considering purchase--in other words, if HD Radio isn't all it's cracked up to be, why pay a premium for a radio that's got little else to offer (no CD player, no network audio streaming, no satellite radio support) ? "
http://reviews.cnet.com/Cambridge_SoundWorks_Radio_820HD_onyx/4505-7866_7-32077730.html
iBiquity - was that "CD" quality, or "seedy" quality ?
"Sound quality nitpicks aside, the real problem with the Cambridge SoundWorks Radio 820HD is the same issue that afflicts all HD Radio products: HD Radio technology hasn't yet distinguished itself as a worthwhile added value. To our ears, the HD Radio stations weren't delivering a dramatic improvement over their analog counterparts. And while we welcomed the presence of digital-only HD2 stations on the dial, many of them seemed to be noticeably compressed--more MP3 than CD. Moreover, the data streams seemed limited to artist, song, and show title info. That's nice, but nothing that can't be done with RDS info on analog stations, and many of the HD stations seem to lack the informational displays altogether. While the digital stations certainly offer static-free reception, that's only if they're within range; a distant HD station will drop in and out if it's too far away. Even more disturbing is that some nearby HD stations seem to blink out randomly--the cell phone-like signal meter drops a full six bars to zero and then shoots back up again a few seconds later, even when the radio is completely stationary. To reiterate, none of these problems are the fault of Cambridge 820HD. The same issues exist on the Polk I-Sonic, and will continue to exist for any and all HD Radio receivers until the stations decide to offer more bandwidth and better data support. While the HD Radio issues aren't particular to the 820HD, they're certainly a factor to weigh when considering purchase--in other words, if HD Radio isn't all it's cracked up to be, why pay a premium for a radio that's got little else to offer (no CD player, no network audio streaming, no satellite radio support) ? "
http://reviews.cnet.com/Cambridge_SoundWorks_Radio_820HD_onyx/4505-7866_7-32077730.html
iBiquity - was that "CD" quality, or "seedy" quality ?