A
amisdead
Guest
fredcantu said:Not with that attitude... and user name.
My immediate dismissiveness in the last post was a kind of joke. And my user name is somewhat ironic because I listen to AM quite a bit and I grew up listening to sports and talk on AM. I have a fondness for the band.
But, let's define "save". If you define it by making enough money to pay the bills then I suppose the answer is yes. If you define save by having a tiny, but loyal audience then the answer, at least for the foreseeable future, is also yes.
However, if you define it by relevancy and likelihood of future relevancy, the answer is a very bold no. In Austin, AM listening accounts for about 10% of total radio listening. But, 10% is actually misleading, because more than two thirds of that AM listening goes to a single station. All those other AM stations fight for tiny scraps. Also, that 10% is of the total pie, not 10% of the sellable demographic. And the situation gets worse with each passing year as the market sprawls further out, engineering gets sloppier, radio receivers get worse and new people are born who likely won't ever even know what AM is nor have any desire to find out.