Usually by this time, we have one or two.
This year I'm not aware of any new Fall shows on the broadcast networks that have been cancelled.
This year I'm not aware of any new Fall shows on the broadcast networks that have been cancelled.
That's sad. It wasn't that good, but it was still good enough for me to watch. Oh, well, I'll enjoy it while it lasts.‘Bad Judge’ & ‘A to Z’ Cancelled By NBC, Will Finish Original 13-Episode Orders
http://deadline.com/2014/10/a-to-z-bad-judge-cancelled-nbc-1201268911/
That's a shame. It was pretty good, but not very good.ABC Ending 'Selfie'
On the schedule for at least one more episode
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/abcs-selfie-canceled-747434
That's a shame. It was pretty good, but not very good.
Usually quality isn't the problem. I think the critics liked this one.I haven't watched any of the new shows, so perhaps I'm out of line - but the 4 major networks are getting their a$$es kicked regularly by the basic and premium cable networks, that have been producing most of the superior programming. So "pretty good, but not very good" won't cut it anymore.
The 4 major networks are getting their a$$es kicked regularly by the basic and premium cable networks, that have been producing most of the superior programming. So "pretty good, but not very good" won't cut it anymore.
In terms of quality, perhaps you're right. In terms of viewers, the broadcast networks are still the ones doing the kicking. Look at the viewership for last week on zap2it.com.
CBS, Fox, NBC and ABC all beat EVERY cable channel for the week.
ESPN is only cable network that had more viewers than Univision, the #5 broadcast network for the week.
ESPN, AMC and Fox News were the only cable channel that had more viewers than The CW.
Zap2it lists 27 cable channels. It only takes 4 broadcast networks to beat the audience of all 27 cable channels.
These rankings are based on "total viewers." The demographics tell a similar story. Sure, cable is growing, but broadcast is still where the eyeballs are.
Broadcast networks: http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/20...wers-in-week-6-ending-november-2-2014/323225/
Cable channels: http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/20...ewers-for-week-ending-november-2-2014/323241/
But behind the raw numbers are troubling demographic trends, right? What happens when the average age of a broadcast network viewer, already in the low/mid 50s, creeps over the magic 55 mark at which advertisers don't consider you worth their efforts? Most of the top cable networks target and reach a much younger average viewer.
I haven't watched any of the new shows, so perhaps I'm out of line - but the 4 major networks are getting their a$$es kicked regularly by the basic and premium cable networks, that have been producing most of the superior programming. So "pretty good, but not very good" won't cut it anymore.
But behind the raw numbers are troubling demographic trends, right? What happens when the average age of a broadcast network viewer, already in the low/mid 50s, creeps over the magic 55 mark at which advertisers don't consider you worth their efforts? Most of the top cable networks target and reach a much younger average viewer.
Is that all they said?I like what Entertainment Weekly said about this:
Selfie: ABC Deleting
Most of my non-cable viewing is live sports so I don't tend to watch many scripted shows over the "Big 4" either. Many of the "quality" scripted programs are now much less than the 20-odd episodes that the Big 4 produce so they are much more like a mini series than an episodic series. It would be very tough and exceedingly expensive to produce something like "The Newsroom" for a regular Big 4 TV season.