• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

CapRadio, former GM in settlement talks

I mean, the only deal I'd be in favor of is that he pays back every f***ing penny and every CapRadio employee and former employee only gets to sock him in the nose once instead of twice, but apparently...

 
I mean, the only deal I'd be in favor of is that he pays back every f***ing penny and every CapRadio employee and former employee only gets to sock him in the nose once instead of twice, but apparently...


Hopefully, CapRadio will be able to get most of the financial compensation it's seeking. Beyond the (alleged) wrongdoing by the former GM, any money recovered could help the station weather the removal of CPB funds in the short term.
 
I see two unfortunate things in this story. The first is that the university is seeking expediency in resolving this. The article says had they gone to trial, the discovery part would take to next spring, which means a trial might take a year from now. It sounds like the university doesn't want to wait. That might give an advantage to the ex-GM.

The second unfortunate bit is that CPB has been defunded. There was a possibility that government funds were involved in this. CPB had announced an investigation. But now, CPB has been defunded, so that investigation will likely not happen, because there's no one at CPB to do it. It could be kicked up to the AG's office, because it was federal money. That would likely just turns it into a political battle.
 
I see two unfortunate things in this story. The first is that the university is seeking expediency in resolving this. The article says had they gone to trial, the discovery part would take to next spring, which means a trial might take a year from now. It sounds like the university doesn't want to wait. That might give an advantage to the ex-GM.

The second unfortunate bit is that CPB has been defunded. There was a possibility that government funds were involved in this. CPB had announced an investigation. But now, CPB has been defunded, so that investigation will likely not happen, because there's no one at CPB to do it. It could be kicked up to the AG's office, because it was federal money. That would likely just turns it into a political battle.
The article says:
Ramirez also said Reina would not be able to respond to the discovery process due to a “parallel criminal investigation,” noting potential issues regarding the Fifth Amendment and the right against self-incrimination. “We’ve been dancing around that in our negotiations,” he said.


The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office last year confirmed to CapRadio it was investigating Reina in a criminal case but would not provide further details.
 


Back
Top Bottom