1069_KIFR said:
Yesterdays New York Times had a great article on CBS. They reported that CBS has the number one or two neilsen wins every night of the week. CBS has built every night around established shows, and their spin offs. Unlike other networks, CBS does not have a secondary cable outlet to run their old programs. They make a bundle on broadcasrting their network owned shows to overseas markets. A good article.
CBS is eventually going to have to take a lesson from history: after the tremendous programming development of the early '70s that gave us "All In The Family," "M*A*S*H," Mary Tyler Moore, Bob Newhart, "The Waltons," "Maude," and "Kojak" (and allowed CBS to have nine of the top ten shows in 1973-74, "Sanford And Son" being the exception), the Eye Network got complacent, allowing ABC to take over the number-one slot (with a little help from the family-hour rule, which neither CBS nor NBC was prepared for) in 1976. If I were programming CBS I'd be preparing against the day when "CSI" and "NCIS" and their spinoffs are no longer gold for the network.
ABC also needs to do the same thing; back then it let "Happy Days," "Laverne & Shirley," etc. to drag on too long (plus some ill-advised scheduling moves in the fall of 1979), by which time CBS had a fresh batch of hot shows, led by "Dallas" and "The Dukes Of Hazzard". "Desperate Housewives," "Grey's Anatomy," and even "Dancing With The Stars" won't run forever either.
(Homer, I think you said the same thing in fewer words; I just wanted to point out that CBS and ABC have both fallen from number one in the past because of complacency.)
As for NBC, I saw in this week's "Entertainment Weekly" that there's a new team ready to replace Jeff Zucker that is reportedly working on some ideas that could jump-start the Peacock Network. The article couldn't resist mentioning that NBC was still number one when Zucker took over; now it's number four.