I don't know if there's a better place to post this, but last night I was watching the weather on the local NBC affiliate, and the video and sound quality were poor. I guess if you don't have to be in the studios to do your job, don't!
CBS Sunday Morning is being hosted from Los Angeles by correspondent Lee Cowan, from a very small, dark studio. He made sure to tell us that Jane Pauley is healthy, and that the building in New York is closed.
Where is CBS master control right now. LA?
As far as I was aware the CBS LA office only controlled the west coast feeds prior to the NYC offices being evacuated.
Have they shut down MC in NY?
NA apparently in one part of the articles the east coast feed for CBS has moved to YES Network in Stamford, CT for now.
BROADCAST ORIGINATION
1 CTM: NY / The Ed Sullivan Theatre
2. EVENING NEWS/ D.C.
3. 4AM News: WASH DC (Jeff Pegues)
4. OVERNIGHT NEWS: Done for the next two days(Gelosi)
3. SATMO: NY / The Ed Sullivan Theatre
4. SAT./SUN,. Wknd News: FROM KTVT IN Dallas their talent – Scott Keenan oversees – Craig Wilson in NY
4. 48 HOURS/. Delivered to MDC for air
5. 60 Minutes/ new material – EDITING OFF CAMPUS – POST PRODUCTON OFF CAMPUS then a double
hop but in the cloud downloaded from Sony CI to MDC. Other option feeding from the digi truck
outside Ed Sullivan Theatre.
6. SUNDAY MORNING/ New material – EDITING OFF CAMPUS – POST PRODUCTION OFF CAMPUS- same
plan as 60 MIN. (Protective backup show in MDC)
CBSN: Working with affiliates with Darius Walker and Rob Gifford running editorial & remotes remotely. CBSN will be upping their edit ability with cloud-based editing.
When Colbert was doing his monologue form home, how was that spliced into the aired show.
I saw the 5:00 news on a local Fox affiliate and the anchor's sound quality and video quality were not up to par. Hey, if you don't have to be there, don't!
Well, by your definition, it might be that it does look good. It's just that we can tell.It's not that hard to make Skype look good, these networks just don't know how to use it.
Well, by your definition, it might be that it does look good. It's just that we can tell.
Skype done well looks like broadcast. Skype with a bad camera, horrible connection, and no mic looks like crap.
Good lighting also helps.
Perhaps it's because some stations lack the cameras needed for work from home operations? Or the news directors/GMs are being too lazy. Maybe there's insurance and other hoops to jump through.
I would hate to see my local newscast look like a Skype feed filled with poor audio and artifacts. Albeit I've seen blocky, buffering-like poor pictures during some reports out in the field, sooooo....
I just don't understand why the engineers are not giving people mics a proper camera and light kits who are doing these things from home.
They are using a real camera, just broadcasting on a cell network. A lot of networks are using LiveU now.Yuppers! How many times have I seen reporters break news on Facebook or on TV, and they are using a *cell phone*. Gah. I mean I know they are called multimedia journalists nowadays, but it would look eons better if you had a real HD television camera AND a camera operator out there. I guess the answer is: you can't always do that in market #1XX.
I've even seen times where it buffered so bad during a live report, that the station went back to the anchor who always said 'we're not sure what happened there, sorry for the technical issue'...