Interesting article in today's RBR: "CBS HD radio imports protested"
http://www.rbr.com/radio/19260.html
It Concerns Mt. Wilson Broadcasters' complaint against CBS bringing in a competing Country format on one of their HD side channels.
RBR makes this observation:
"...is it wise to further fragment the radio audience by introducing any side channels at all? Shouldn’t HD be used to enhance broadcast quality in an effort to maintain enough signal scarcity to allow broadcasters to offer a reasonably-sized audience to advertisers?"
But I think this complaint might also bring up the issue of whether or not side channels should be factored in to the limit of stations one company can own in any given market. In the end, I can't see the FCC ruling against this move by CBS as it touches on programming issues which is something the Commission doesn't involve itself with.
c5
http://www.rbr.com/radio/19260.html
It Concerns Mt. Wilson Broadcasters' complaint against CBS bringing in a competing Country format on one of their HD side channels.
RBR makes this observation:
"...is it wise to further fragment the radio audience by introducing any side channels at all? Shouldn’t HD be used to enhance broadcast quality in an effort to maintain enough signal scarcity to allow broadcasters to offer a reasonably-sized audience to advertisers?"
But I think this complaint might also bring up the issue of whether or not side channels should be factored in to the limit of stations one company can own in any given market. In the end, I can't see the FCC ruling against this move by CBS as it touches on programming issues which is something the Commission doesn't involve itself with.
c5