Like your avatar.
Like your avatar.
That could work, assuming CBS would allow it (why wouldn't they? As you point out, they're not going to be needing it, so why bother claiming fraud? Besides, it wouldn't be fraud if there were a legal agreement that lets Audacy do it).Reading all of these various thoughts and opinions, it struck me that the Audacy stations might have a simple solution to this problem, if CBS plays along. As a condition for not suing CBS for breach, Audacy & CBS agree that Audacy can continue using the soon-to-be-obsoleted TOH bong and network news sounder over their own white label version of AP news. AP produces the 3 (or 4) minute newscast without any commercial cutout, all the Audacy stations carry it and Audacy pays AP a bulk rate for the product. The stations now have another couple of minutes of inventory to sell. Possible a win-win, and CBS sure won't need that sounder any more.
I'd enjoy that! I grew up hearing the old sounder, and I've never really liked the current one when it came out, what, 15 years ago now?If it's too problematic to segue from CBS News using their current sounder to it being on top of an AP (or Brand X) newscast as of May 22, go into the past a generation or two (or three) of CBS News sounders and use an older one. Nobody but us would even notice the difference.
That could work, assuming CBS would allow it (why wouldn't they?
This is assuming KCBS sticks with the affiliation until shutdown. If it were me making the decisions, I wouldn't wait that long. Might as well get it over with as soon as practicable.Listeners to KCBS follow the news, so they are certainly aware of the CBS radio shutdown. As well as hearing on air announcements from mgmt regarding this. It's not going to come as any shock or surprise for most listeners when the change happens May 23.
I want to know what's going to happen to the sound archives.What I'm looking forward to hearing is how CBS handles the very last TOH newscast. I really think they should provide affiliates with a one hour goodbye special, that can be aired just before that last newscast. Will CBS radio acknowledge it's 99 year history? It would be sad if they didn't.
I want to know what's going to happen to the sound archives.
Very interesting.NBC still owns its radio archives.
I didn't know this site reached alternate universes.Maybe Audacy could bring back the FREE-FM format after CBS News radio goes out of business?
Maybe Audacy could bring back the FREE-FM format after CBS News radio goes out of business?
bayarearadio.org
Hence the timing of the shutdown, you mean ... as for affiliate contract litigation, even if possible, I think not. Lawyers win$ and their clients lose! Not worth the money, certainly not enough loss or injury.Mike, 60 days is legally required by the federal WARN Act. .......
Why use someone else's talent to host newscasts? Isn't that what KCBS people do?
I understand using AP's actualities. But I don't see any value to using their anchor.
I'll try to be clearer. The WARN Act is a federal law that requires companies larger than a certain size (number of employees) to provide a minimum of 60 days of notice (or severance pay in lieu of full notice) to employees about to be laid off. If the layoff meets or exceeds the minimum threshold of employees (as defined in the Act), then the company is mandated to notify (warn, get it?) those employees at least 60 days prior to the start of said layoffs. If you're below the threshold, then the law doesn't apply. If you're only laying off a handful of workers, again it doesn't apply. And if you didn't make the 60 day threshold, you still must pay the affected employees for the number of days you missed it by.Hence the timing of the shutdown, you mean ... as for affiliate contract litigation, even if possible, I think not. Lawyers win$ and their clients lose! Not worth the money, certainly not enough loss or injury.
No. I'd just forgotten it. 'm not sure they have the resources for wall-to-wall audio coverage of a major breaking national or world event. At least not at the level that ABC or (until May 22) CBS have.Is AP network news gone?
I'll try to be clearer. The WARN Act is a federal law that requires companies larger than a certain size (number of employees) to provide a minimum of 60 days of notice (or severance pay in lieu of full notice) to employees about to be laid off. If the layoff meets or exceeds the minimum threshold of employees (as defined in the Act), then the company is mandated to notify (warn, get it?) those employees at least 60 days prior to the start of said layoffs. If you're below the threshold, then the law doesn't apply. If you're only laying off a handful of workers, again it doesn't apply. And if you didn't make the 60 day threshold, you still must pay the affected employees for the number of days you missed it by.
If random employer (let's call them, ohh, CBS) decides to lay off all the employees in a division (let's call it radio news), they need to provide 60 days of notice to affected employees. If they only can give them 40 days notice, they must pay them as if they had given 60 days, so an extra 20 days of salary continuation or lump sum severance. That's the federally-mandated minimum. Many companies will pay employees a severance per an internal policy, which may be one week per year of service, or some other metric. Labor contracts may have their own requirements, but those have been freely negotiated between the parties. Think CBS and SAG-AFTRA, or IBEW.
CBS may spell out how much advance notice they owe affiliates if they want to terminate a program, or a service, or a business. But that's a contractual or a policy requirement. The WARN Act is a labor law.
Among the possible replacements for CBS News Radio is ABC News Audio, which is the largest network radio news service in the U.S. with 1,500 affiliates. The Audacy stations currently use ABC News content outside of its hourly newscasts.
KFI-AM currently carries the ABC News Audio newscasts in Los Angeles. Exclusivity of the ABC News Audio affiliations are determined on a market-by-market basis, according to a representative at the network.
CBS may spell out how much advance notice they owe affiliates if they want to terminate a program, or a service, or a business. But that's a contractual or a policy requirement. The WARN Act is a labor law.
Even in the 1970s, my experience was that relatively few stations carried it. For example, in the St. Louis area, the only station that carried AP was a suburban station in Alton, Illinois.And I couldn't tell you the last time I listened to a station that had AP Network News.
There are still some stations in rural Iowa that carry AP radio news. I can’t remember which ones but they’re the only ones I’ve heard it on ever.Even in the 1970s, my experience was that relatively few stations carried it. For example, in the St. Louis area, the only station that carried AP was a suburban station in Alton, Illinois.
My understanding was that stations preferred to barter for network service rather than pay for it outright.
UPI had more stations for its audio service than AP, but that may have been because some regional networks wholesaled it. For instance, Learfield's Missourinet wholesaled UPI in Missouri until 1982 when it switched to the then-new ABC Direction network. Offering the national feed wholesale saved line charges for some small-town stations that had the line anyway for Learfield's agricultural network; as well, Learfield moved to satellite distribution fairly early on in the decade.