• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

CBS Sues Stern

CBS Sues Howard Stern
Network Cites Breaches of Contract, Unjust Enrichment
NEW YORK, Feb. 28 -- CBS Radio today announced that it has filed suit against Howard Stern, his company One Twelve, Inc., his agent Don Buchwald, his agent's firm Don Buchwald & Associates, Inc. and Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc.

The lawsuit is for compensatory and punitive damages for multiple breaches of contract, fraud, unjust enrichment, and misappropriation of CBS Radio's broadcast time. It further seeks damages from Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc. for unfair competition and tortious interference with Stern's CBS contract.

The 43-page complaint charges:

Howard Stern repeatedly and willfully breached his written contract with CBS Radio over the last 22 months of that contract, misappropriated millions of dollars worth of CBS Radio airtime for his own financial benefit, and fraudulently concealed his interest in hundreds of millions of dollars of Sirius stock while promoting it on the air.

That on or about January 9, 2006, Sirius paid over 34 million shares of stock, valued at approximately $220 million, to Stern and his agent because Sirius exceeded by the end of 2005 certain subscriber targets that were set in the Sirius-Stern contract. The complaint alleges that the Sirius-Stern contract provided that Stern was to receive this stock payment in 2010, but it had an acceleration provision that allowed Stern to receive the compensation as early as January 2006 if these subscriber targets were met. All of Stern's actions for which he received this expedited compensation occurred during the time that Stern was under exclusive contract with CBS Radio, when the Sirius payment terms to Stern were kept secret.

This contract thus provided a compelling incentive for Stern to do all that he could to help Sirius reach the subscriber targets by the end of 2005 so that he could receive his Sirius stock payment as soon as possible while Sirius's stock was extremely valuable. Without the accelerated payment, Stern would risk the decline of the Sirius stock value. By taking action on CBS Radio's airtime in 2004 and 2005, Stern assured himself of immediate access to $200 million in assets that could be readily converted to cash.

By engaging in continuous promotion of Sirius on CBS Radio airtime without any payment by Sirius to CBS for these advertisements and by pocketing over $200 million dollars for his personal benefit, Stern misappropriated millions of dollars worth of CBS Radio airtime for his own financial benefit and the financial benefit of Don Buchwald, his agent, and Sirius in contravention of repeated directives by CBS Radio.

That Stern also breached his contractual obligation to inform CBS Radio of plans that might have a bearing on his future. Under the Agreement, Stern had the obligation to give CBS Radio the first opportunity to discuss participation in radio projects that are conceived during the
term of the Agreement, even if the concept or project was launched or implemented after the term. Stern ignored that responsibility, and negotiated and concluded his agreement with Sirius in secret.

To this day, Stern continues to breach his contract by refusing to return property that belongs to CBS Radio -- the recordings of his CBS radio program that, under his Agreement with CBS Radio, belong to the company.

The suit further charges that Sirius intentionally interfered with and procured Stern's breach of the Agreement. Sirius knew that Stern had a contractual obligation to maximize the prospects for the success of the CBS Radio program and to comply with his duty of good faith. Sirius intentionally induced and caused Stern to breach these contractual provisions by offering to accelerate Stern's payment of millions of dollars in stock options to promote Sirius on CBS airwaves and by concealing Stern's stock interest from CBS Radio.

The complaint in this lawsuit was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York.
 
It's about time CBS Radio went after him. He did give Sirius a 14 month commercial, and now CBS is due money for that commercial. I hope they win and take all of his money!


> CBS Sues Howard Stern
> Network Cites Breaches of Contract, Unjust Enrichment
> NEW YORK, Feb. 28 -- CBS Radio today announced that it has
> filed suit against Howard Stern, his company One Twelve,
> Inc., his agent Don Buchwald, his agent's firm Don Buchwald
> & Associates, Inc. and Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc.
>
> The lawsuit is for compensatory and punitive damages for
> multiple breaches of contract, fraud, unjust enrichment, and
> misappropriation of CBS Radio's broadcast time. It further
> seeks damages from Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc. for unfair
> competition and tortious interference with Stern's CBS
> contract.
>
> The 43-page complaint charges:
>
> Howard Stern repeatedly and willfully breached his written
> contract with CBS Radio over the last 22 months of that
> contract, misappropriated millions of dollars worth of CBS
> Radio airtime for his own financial benefit, and
> fraudulently concealed his interest in hundreds of millions
> of dollars of Sirius stock while promoting it on the air.
>
> That on or about January 9, 2006, Sirius paid over 34
> million shares of stock, valued at approximately $220
> million, to Stern and his agent because Sirius exceeded by
> the end of 2005 certain subscriber targets that were set in
> the Sirius-Stern contract. The complaint alleges that the
> Sirius-Stern contract provided that Stern was to receive
> this stock payment in 2010, but it had an acceleration
> provision that allowed Stern to receive the compensation as
> early as January 2006 if these subscriber targets were met.
> All of Stern's actions for which he received this expedited
> compensation occurred during the time that Stern was under
> exclusive contract with CBS Radio, when the Sirius payment
> terms to Stern were kept secret.
>
> This contract thus provided a compelling incentive for Stern
> to do all that he could to help Sirius reach the subscriber
> targets by the end of 2005 so that he could receive his
> Sirius stock payment as soon as possible while Sirius's
> stock was extremely valuable. Without the accelerated
> payment, Stern would risk the decline of the Sirius stock
> value. By taking action on CBS Radio's airtime in 2004 and
> 2005, Stern assured himself of immediate access to $200
> million in assets that could be readily converted to cash.
>
> By engaging in continuous promotion of Sirius on CBS Radio
> airtime without any payment by Sirius to CBS for these
> advertisements and by pocketing over $200 million dollars
> for his personal benefit, Stern misappropriated millions of
> dollars worth of CBS Radio airtime for his own financial
> benefit and the financial benefit of Don Buchwald, his
> agent, and Sirius in contravention of repeated directives by
> CBS Radio.
>
> That Stern also breached his contractual obligation to
> inform CBS Radio of plans that might have a bearing on his
> future. Under the Agreement, Stern had the obligation to
> give CBS Radio the first opportunity to discuss
> participation in radio projects that are conceived during
> the
> term of the Agreement, even if the concept or project was
> launched or implemented after the term. Stern ignored that
> responsibility, and negotiated and concluded his agreement
> with Sirius in secret.
>
> To this day, Stern continues to breach his contract by
> refusing to return property that belongs to CBS Radio -- the
> recordings of his CBS radio program that, under his
> Agreement with CBS Radio, belong to the company.
>
> The suit further charges that Sirius intentionally
> interfered with and procured Stern's breach of the
> Agreement. Sirius knew that Stern had a contractual
> obligation to maximize the prospects for the success of the
> CBS Radio program and to comply with his duty of good faith.
> Sirius intentionally induced and caused Stern to breach
> these contractual provisions by offering to accelerate
> Stern's payment of millions of dollars in stock options to
> promote Sirius on CBS airwaves and by concealing Stern's
> stock interest from CBS Radio.
>
> The complaint in this lawsuit was filed in the Supreme Court
> of the State of New York, County of New York.
>
 
I'm not sure how to feel about either CBS, or Stern. Howard did give "free" advertising to Sirius, while on the air at CBS, but both he AND CBS made LOTS of $$$$$ selling that show across the country. There are plenty of jocks/morning shows, that lost because of both these entities. Maybe it's time for what's gone around, to come around?

Just my two cents worth...
 
> I'm not sure how to feel about either CBS, or Stern. Howard
> did give "free" advertising to Sirius, while on the air at
> CBS, but both he AND CBS made LOTS of $$$$$ selling that
> show across the country. There are plenty of jocks/morning
> shows, that lost because of both these entities. Maybe it's
> time for what's gone around, to come around?
>
> Just my two cents worth...
>

Well I personally think all the non-CBS stations (Like WBZX) should also sue Stern and Sirius for the 14 month commercial Stern gave. In a way isn't the 14 month commercial plugola/payola?
 
> > I'm not sure how to feel about either CBS, or Stern.
> Howard
> > did give "free" advertising to Sirius, while on the air at
>
> > CBS, but both he AND CBS made LOTS of $$$$$ selling that
> > show across the country. There are plenty of
> jocks/morning
> > shows, that lost because of both these entities. Maybe
> it's
> > time for what's gone around, to come around?
> >
> > Just my two cents worth...
> >
>
> Well I personally think all the non-CBS stations (Like WBZX)
> should also sue Stern and Sirius for the 14 month commercial
> Stern gave. In a way isn't the 14 month commercial
> plugola/payola?
>

In a way the Stern lawsuit may be doing him a favor by thrusting him back in the public eye after he had essentially disappeared for most listeners. I.e., more publicity when he needs it. And the timing is doubly curious given that the suit was filed just after Stern's NY, LA and Chicago replacements posted miniscule shares in their debut month (almost off-the-map in LA and Chicago). Maybe CBS should have held off awhile. Why should CBS put Stern back in the limelight and give him reason to gloat just as they're trying to get listeners to forget about Howard and embrace his replacements?<P ID="signature">______________
Nu_Roo_2 formerly Nu__Roo formerly Nu_Roo</P>
 
> > > I'm not sure how to feel about either CBS, or Stern.
> > Howard
> > > did give "free" advertising to Sirius, while on the air
> at
> >
> > > CBS, but both he AND CBS made LOTS of $$$$$ selling that
>
> > > show across the country. There are plenty of
> > jocks/morning
> > > shows, that lost because of both these entities. Maybe
> > it's
> > > time for what's gone around, to come around?
> > >
> > > Just my two cents worth...
> > >
> >
> > Well I personally think all the non-CBS stations (Like
> WBZX)
> > should also sue Stern and Sirius for the 14 month
> commercial



> > Stern gave. In a way isn't the 14 month commercial
> > plugola/payola?
> >
>
> In a way the Stern lawsuit may be doing him a favor by
> thrusting him back in the public eye after he had
> essentially disappeared for most listeners. I.e., more
> publicity when he needs it. And the timing is doubly
> curious given that the suit was filed just after Stern's NY,
> LA and Chicago replacements posted miniscule shares in
> their debut month (almost off-the-map in LA and Chicago).
> Maybe CBS should have held off awhile. Why should CBS put
> Stern back in the limelight and give him reason to gloat
> just as they're trying to get listeners to forget about
> Howard and embrace his replacements?
>


Ah the smell of greed is in the air!!! Always bet on GREEDYGUT to WIN, PLACE, AND SHOW in this race.

Picture it...Washington 1996
1. FCC goes for expanded ownership rules, Clinton signs it, and a technology that by rule is designed to "serve the community ('local') interest" begins its journey to become a 1200 pound gorilla that generally serves only the shareholders, force feeds the community jocks that have never been to many of the communities in which they are heard, music that the labels pay to have played, and literally has stations in many markets that are NOT designed to win. (Via Randy Michaels genius)You gotta admit, the guy is brilliant from a corporate sense.

2. As a result of fact 1, syndicated shows and jocks become bigger than stations and formats. Many talented personalities lose their jobs, Consultants and research replace PD's artistry, and the grooming of solid personalities for the future is all but ended.

3. Satellite radio sees the chink in the armor of both companies and major personalities, and says lets stop the virtual monopoly by letting the people pay for choices and variety while buying away choice jocks who have become larger than life.

4. TR Gorillas get ticked off at this, and sue.

Solution.....(Although it aint gonna happen as the horse has already left the barn)

1. TR goes back to live and local.

2. Provides programming that truly "serves the interest of the community".

3. FCC tightens ownership rules, forcing now smaller and more numorous radio companies to play to win with every property.

Yea, I know all the devils advocate points regarding increased stability of radio companies through consolidation and the like, but TR's problem these days is that consolidation has come very close to running its course and the way to survive and thrive is to go back to basics.

Now to the the questions I have for all who care to answer are these:

Does anyone find it interesting that CBS files a suit after Stern leaves as opposed to questioning his heavy mention of Sirius over those 14 or so months and firing him for the misappropriation, and contract breach they now allege?

How much did the 1200 pound Gorillas hedge their bets by investing HEAVILY in satellite radio, thus turning a profit of their own in Stern's conversion to the medium?


Since it seems that I see a lot of ("radio sucks" commentary on many of these boards, Why doesn't TR blow satellite out of the water by being what the people want?

ANSWER.....I vote GREED!
 
> How much did the 1200 pound Gorillas hedge their bets by
> investing HEAVILY in satellite radio, thus turning a profit
> of their own in Stern's conversion to the medium?

I hear that CC just put a 24/7 simulcast of WLW on XM. I know they have an ownership stake in XM, but this one still surprised me. For a few seconds. At this point I don't think it's clear whether that kind of move is a good, bad or neutral thing for terrestrial.<P ID="signature">______________
Nu_Roo_2 formerly Nu__Roo formerly Nu_Roo</P>
 
Great points! I have to admit to agreeing with darksoldier, GREED appears to be the OLNY motivating factor for anything in business, these days.

As fas as WLW on XM, I suppose it only makes sense to have the most powerful station in the country accessible to the satellite radio listener... no matter who owns them, no?
 
> I hear that CC just put a 24/7 simulcast of WLW on XM. I
> know they have an ownership stake in XM, but this one still
> surprised me. For a few seconds. At this point I don't
> think it's clear whether that kind of move is a good, bad or
> neutral thing for terrestrial.
>

You are right and wrong in the same paragraph. Yes CC has put WLW on XM, but Clear Channel does not have any financial stake or partial ownership in the satellite company. CC sold off their shares over the past several years, and putting WLW on XM is from a settlement between CC and XM over revenue sharing that was lost when XM dropped WLTW-FM (NYC) and KIIS-FM (L.A.) simulcasts several years ago (it's in XM's recent SEC filing). Personally..even though we can get WLW here in Columbus as a local station, it's still pretty cool that the orignal "Nation's Station" is back as the Nation's station! Yeah yeah yeah, it's a CC station, but almost their whole line-up is local with the only syndication is Paul Harvey (which brings him to satellite), and Truckin' Bozo show, but even that originates from WLW. That total local origination you have to admit is extremely rare for a Clear Channel Station, and since WLW is one of THE stations in Clear Channel, that local origination won't be lost anytime soon expecially now that it's on XM.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom