"To be honest, he's worn out his welcome, is not known as a credible news anything, and is not even that well liked. No TV wants him, and KDWN and its not-from-Vegas management apparently didn't do any research before hiring him."
Great Scott, you must have had some kind of fight or something with the man. I like the guy's style, he doesn't seem to have an obsession with giving me his "take" on any given story (like I would give a fat rat's ass about what any anchor thinks about any story). I hate radio and tv anchors who think I care about their opinions. Just read the story and go home. Nathan has a smooth delivery, doesn't mispronounce names and words, doesn't stumble and is every bit as good as any news voice on L.A. radio today. My question is, why would the mega-brains at KDWN put a kid on at night with a massive lisp and and a voice that would clear a bat cave? I know everyone deserves a chance, but my gawd, didn't anyone think before they put this kid on the air next to Phil Hendrie?
