If KQED is not beating up KCBS for news, it should be. As I understand it, the problem with commercial news stations is that the format is expensive, and they have to run a huge commercial load to make a profit. The constant commercials are mind-numbing.
KQED wins in share by, on average, about about 40% SF in 25-54. KCBS pulls closer in 55+ which seems logical as the "22 minute" approach is one that goes back to "X-tra News over Los Angeles" in 1960 and the SF implementation later in that decade.
Interestingly, the 25-54 cume of the two is nearly identical.
In 18+ persons, the share is much tighter, with KCBS winning. KCBS leans older, a detriment in sales. KQED does not care about sales demos as much as "donor demos" and its image among underwriters.
KQED is more of a long time-span listening format, which is logical given the longer form content. So on similar cume, it wins based on TSL.