• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Changes Coming to Air America

M

Mark_Giardina

Guest
http://www.radioandrecords.com/Newsroom/2005_11_29/airamerica.asp<P ID="signature">______________
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted and I won't be laid a hand on.
I don't do these things to other people and I expect the same from them".</P>
 
http:> //www.radioandrecords.com/Newsroom/2005_11_29/airamerica.asp
>
I had a chance to listen to AAR's "Morning Sedition" on WLIB for a few days this summer while visiting family in North Jersey. I don't really feel comfortable "ripping" people's work, but I can only say the change was long overdue. I'm discounting any political criticism, speaking from the perspective of presentation and execution.

It's a given that morning drive is a tough haul in any major, large, medium and even small market, let alone Market #1. The AAR morning show was behind the eight ball from the get go. "Morning Sedition" was a cute play-on-words considering NPR's "Morning Edition," but it got old very fast. Occasionally, I'll use a similar play-on-words such as "Small Things Considered" when I serve up some water-cooler stuff from AP or kickers from Romenesko's Obscure Store. While it may be mildly amusing when used with the appropriate material it's not something that I'd rely on for a steady diet.

From my perspective in news-talk radio, the AAR morning show sounded disjointed. The formatics and content were inadequate. There was minimal teasing, set-up and pay-off. It sounded lethargic. The hosts stepped on each other and seemed directionless. Poorly planned. Poorly produced. Maybe I caught them on two successive bad days (heaven knows we all have bad days on the air.)

While listening, I often thought, "What's the motivation to listen to this?" Consider the question knowing that morning drive in NY offers Stern on K-Rock, Curtis & Kuby on WABC, traffic and weather together and aggressive local, national and world news on WCBS and WINS; Imus on The Fan, the established presentation on the NPR affiliate(s), entertainment on Z-100, WPLJ, Kiss and so much more. How's that for a "Murderers Row?!" And there's WLIB with a morning show that sounds unpolished, unplanned and unexciting.

Seems to me the change should have been made a while ago. The sand may have just about passed through the hourglass.
 
We've been discussing this in the volatile News/Talk forum.

What I suspect might happen is that WROC might find more room for Stephanie Miller's show which is currently running weekends. Unfortunately, it clashes with Springer's show, so it won't clear live.

The morning lineup leaves a lot to be desired.
 
> We've been discussing this in the volatile News/Talk forum.
>
> What I suspect might happen is that WROC might find more
> room for Stephanie Miller's show which is currently running
> weekends. Unfortunately, it clashes with Springer's show,
> so it won't clear live.
>
> The morning lineup leaves a lot to be desired.

I believe Stephanie Miller's show is now on weekdays on WROC, replacing Springer at least a month ago.

>
 
> I believe Stephanie Miller's show is now on weekdays on
> WROC, replacing Springer at least a month ago.

Ahhh... I listen to AAR on my XM in the car (better signal and no time delay of Randi Rhodes). It sounds like a good decision. She's definitely better than Springer.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom