K
knowsnews
Guest
OK, I've had enough of her.
Other than the fact that she can't write, she can't report and her stories have more holes in them than a golf course, her voice is intolerable.
Don't get me wrong. I always give new reporters the benefit of the doubt. But she reports like she's working for a high school station. Examples:
A car wreck in which the drivers were going at "a high rate of speed." Who, other than police, uses the term high rate of speed?
Two teenagers are shot to death in Atlanta. She shows video of a woman on a cell phone, with the voiceover "this woman finds out that two of her relatives have been shot." 45 seconds later, during the SAME voice track, she says police spoke to the woman and discovered she had no connection to the victims. But she let that voicetrack go on the air 4 times that morning!! Can't she change the voicetrack???
She covered a shooting in a "wooded area" (another police term that no one uses in conversation) and shot her standup in front of woods. She says "the crime scene is a wooded area about a half mile from here...and it looks a lot like the woods behind me." So, now she's showing us trees to give us an idea of what woods look like?
This morning, she's at WalMart, talking to last minute shoppers. She "stops" them as they leave, with their carts, from the checkout line. She gives the impression that she's stopping them at random. Well, if she is, then she's insane for doing that live. If she arranged it beforehand, then don't send them back to the checkout line and make it seems as if it's at random. Again, amateurish.
I'm open to anyone's comments. Convince me, please, that she deserves a full time job in major market television.
Other than the fact that she can't write, she can't report and her stories have more holes in them than a golf course, her voice is intolerable.
Don't get me wrong. I always give new reporters the benefit of the doubt. But she reports like she's working for a high school station. Examples:
A car wreck in which the drivers were going at "a high rate of speed." Who, other than police, uses the term high rate of speed?
Two teenagers are shot to death in Atlanta. She shows video of a woman on a cell phone, with the voiceover "this woman finds out that two of her relatives have been shot." 45 seconds later, during the SAME voice track, she says police spoke to the woman and discovered she had no connection to the victims. But she let that voicetrack go on the air 4 times that morning!! Can't she change the voicetrack???
She covered a shooting in a "wooded area" (another police term that no one uses in conversation) and shot her standup in front of woods. She says "the crime scene is a wooded area about a half mile from here...and it looks a lot like the woods behind me." So, now she's showing us trees to give us an idea of what woods look like?
This morning, she's at WalMart, talking to last minute shoppers. She "stops" them as they leave, with their carts, from the checkout line. She gives the impression that she's stopping them at random. Well, if she is, then she's insane for doing that live. If she arranged it beforehand, then don't send them back to the checkout line and make it seems as if it's at random. Again, amateurish.
I'm open to anyone's comments. Convince me, please, that she deserves a full time job in major market television.