kilamanjero said:If Skip Murphy & Company comes back I hope he demands complete creative control on music and a complete overhaul of the current music programming with the over-spun power songs. K-104 isn't a CHR, it should more more "contemporary" in the sense of giving power songs spins but this 90+ times a week has got to go. They need to limit it to 60 times per week and seriously daypart their music with the more street and club oriented songs to after 6pm unless its a power song.
kilamanjero said:If Skip Murphy & Company comes back I hope he demands complete creative control on music and a complete overhaul of the current music programming with the over-spun power songs. K-104 isn't a CHR, it should more more "contemporary" in the sense of giving power songs spins but this 90+ times a week has got to go. They need to limit it to 60 times per week and seriously daypart their music with the more street and club oriented songs to after 6pm unless its a power song.
salemjedi54 said:kilamanjero said:If Skip Murphy & Company comes back I hope he demands complete creative control on music and a complete overhaul of the current music programming with the over-spun power songs. K-104 isn't a CHR, it should more more "contemporary" in the sense of giving power songs spins but this 90+ times a week has got to go. They need to limit it to 60 times per week and seriously daypart their music with the more street and club oriented songs to after 6pm unless its a power song.
But if they did that, don't you think they would just KILL KRNB. If you bring Skip Murphy back, put them on KRNB not K104. K104 will never be the station it was back in the mid to late 80's. But I think you could recreate that on KRNB and then you can have the 18-34 crowd and the 25-54 crowd.
kilamanjero said:salemjedi54 said:kilamanjero said:If Skip Murphy & Company comes back I hope he demands complete creative control on music and a complete overhaul of the current music programming with the over-spun power songs. K-104 isn't a CHR, it should more more "contemporary" in the sense of giving power songs spins but this 90+ times a week has got to go. They need to limit it to 60 times per week and seriously daypart their music with the more street and club oriented songs to after 6pm unless its a power song.
But if they did that, don't you think they would just KILL KRNB. If you bring Skip Murphy back, put them on KRNB not K104. K104 will never be the station it was back in the mid to late 80's. But I think you could recreate that on KRNB and then you can have the 18-34 crowd and the 25-54 crowd.
Uh Salemjedi54, that makes absolutely no sense at all. Have you looked at KRNB's horrible ratings lately? 2.7 share
KRNB is a waste of money for Service to operate now. K-104 (104.5) could be a full-service urban station again because it has a better signal and heritage of nearly 4 decades of legacy; whereas, KRNB has been around less than 2 decades. Why on earth would they put that format on 105.7 signal when it is clear to only half of the market's core population?
Here's a comparison maps of the 2 signals:
105.7: http://maps.google.com/?q=http://ww...B&freq=105.7&contour=60&city=DECATUR&state=TX
104.5: http://maps.google.com/?q=http://ww...FM&freq=104.5&contour=60&city=DALLAS&state=TX
Your love of KRNB is admirable but it's impractical for Service to bring back Skip Murphy and place him on a lousy signal such as 105.7.
kilamanjero said:It's also clear to me that you are bias to your demographic (25-54), but the smart move is to program the station to obtain everyone whom enjoys urban music from 18-49 years old which would help them in the overall 18+. The fact is KRNB was basically created to be a dumping ground for the gold records too old to even spin on the most liberal of "full service, urban contemporary" stations. It shows in the ratings and its fringe signal. At the end of the day, ratings = revenue so they are trying to pull back in more 25-54 demographic by programming the station as such like getting back Skip Murphy.
kilamanjero said:KRNB main purpose was basically a flanker for the hits and gold records that didn't fall within the 18-34 demographic in 1996. However, the way they programmed the station was obvious that it was never meant to be anything but a flanker. However, both K-Soul and KRNB have failed to pull anything ratings wise even in the PPM environment. There are other cities with UACs with fringe signals yet high competitive ratings in other markets like Atlanta that does much better than both them in the overall 18+. If Service truly felt like doing something KRNB then they would have did it years ago. Maybe it could be the "back in the day" station of the market, but it looks like Service is going to shift K-104 back to the 18-49 audience if Skip Murphy comes back. Where that leaves KRNB? I guess to cover the 45-54 year old portion of the older demographic group.
Oh yeah, the funny thing about the changes in music when a station that targets 18-34 like the current K-104 and a station that targets 18-49 is that the "cRap" as you call it is limited to only evenings and weekends when they are live broadcasting. Most people that are 25-34 years old tend to enjoy stations that place limitations on such music and spins of more conscious hip-hop artists of the younger generations like Lupe Fiasco, B.o.B., etc. along side a majority R&B-oriented song selection during the daytime hours. It's all about balance.