First, a 3 meter antenna will radiate 10 times less efficiently at 530kHz than at 1700kHz (radiation resistances: 530kHz=.01 ohm, 1700kHz=.1 ohm).
Second, the coil required to resonate with a 3 meter antenna needs to be very much larger at 530 than at 1700.
Here are coil sizes for both frequencies assuming a 106" long 1/2" dia. copper pipe antenna.:
1700 kHz
--------
Inductance: 295uH
Turns of #16 magnet wire on 3.5" dia. form: 71
Linear length of winding on form: 3.74"
Length of wire needed: 65.8 ft.
530 kHz
--------
Inductance: 3,045uH
Turns of #16 magnet wire on 3.5" dia. form: 539
Linear length of winding on form: 28.5"
Length of wire needed: 501.6 ft.
Since it is generally accepted that the linear length of the winding + antenna length + wires must be less than 3 meters, the 28.5" length of the 530 coil would require shortening the 106" antenna by about 25" which will reduce radiation and actually require an even larger coil. A multi-layer coil with the same wire size or a single-layer coil with smaller wire would reduce the length, but both solutions introduce some additional coil loss.
It is certainly possible to build a 3 meter antenna for 530, but the 10x reduction in radiation resistance and the huge coil make it less efficient and less practical to build.
> I have noticed since I started reading the community radio
> board that most part 15 AM radio stations are on the upper
> band area. The reason given was the tx is more effecient at
> those freq's and lower noise on the upper band. I have
> always understood that you needed less power on the lower
> band to go the same distance. My question can you tune a tx
> to work well on the lower band and have good range? Where I
> live the lower band is someone quieter, especially at night,
>
> than the upper band.
>
<P ID="signature">______________
Phil B
</P>