e-dawg said:
What do you think about Christian Radio Network who buys or set up radio stations that is 500-3,000 miles away from the home market?
My hunch is that this was e-dawg's primary question. Unfortunately, it's not as cut and dried as it may appear--although I will say right off the bat that this underscores why I don't like using the word "network" to describe a lot of station groups.
First, it shouldn't be assumed that all of the organizations within that list are equal in terms of their geographic spread: Family Life Network pretty much just operates within western New York and northern Pennsylvania; its coverage area may be roughly on par with (or even less than) that of, say, Michigan's Smile FM or the Houston-based KHCB group.
That said, it doesn't take a lot of stations to have a sprawling footprint. California's Living Proof Broadcasting has only a few full-power stations (and some translators), but they tend to be spread out.
Separately, it should be noted that some of the groups within that list do have multiple "home markets". At least Bott and Moody definitely operate out of regional (or even local) offices/studios.
Yes, there are a lot of cases where such "networks" operate in many areas without having any local presence. Even so, there is at least some difference (not related to programming) between Catholic broadcasters like Immaculate Heart Radio and Starboard Media/Relevant Radio (which largely operate on AM stations) and the aforementioned WPCS/Rejoice Radio (which feeds a whole lot of FM translators [via satellite] out of maybe a couple full-power FM stations).
And, this gets back to why I try to avoid using "network" in a lot of cases here--preferring to use "station group" or something similar. While Moody still produces programs that air on non-Moody-owned stations--and even EMF has K-Love and Air 1 programming on a handful of non-EMF-owned stations--many of the others tend to just carry their own programming and/or air programming that's produced by others. In other words, they don't distribute programming to non-owned/operated stations.
It also neglects the fact that there are actual networks that distribute programming (including full formats) to a lot of stations without owning many; one example that I think fits this description is Radio 74 Internationale.
So, getting back to the original question, it almost is another way of asking, "What do you think of the 'Great Translator Invasion of 2003'?" (See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcast_relay_station#Great_Translator_Invasion_of_2003.)