• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Citadel Rewards Suleman & Ellis

If it ain't illegal, the fact that it's immoral is irrelevant.
Click to expand...

That parallels what Howard Cosell once told Al Davis about his attempts to move the Raiders out of Oakland: "Legally you're in the right, morally you're in the wrong." This pretty much applies to so much that goes on nowadays in the radio and non-radio world.

BTW, go to your local health insurance company's websites and check out their monthly premium plans and see if you can afford to buy this yourself. For the uninsured In NY(who have a little income), there's Healthy NY, but it's one crappy plan and the rates go up every year. For most folks, employer plans are the only thing they can afford.
 
So what has happened to The Big A in this conversation that he stirred up? Did he re-think his position after being subtly and not-so-subtly challenged? Or did he behave like most conservatives when they are presented with facts that refute their allegations and assumptions-did he just say, "I'm done with these people who just call me names and I'm going somewhere else now."

Another radio group I'm part of calls these people "right wing nuts." We need to be aware of them, but basically they should be ignored because they discard the truth in favour of the bullsh*t they spew.
 
Debaser said:
So what has happened to The Big A in this conversation that he stirred up? Did he re-think his position after being subtly and not-so-subtly challenged?
Click to expand...

What are you talking about?
 
Your defense of Citadel and their business practices stirred some lively conversation, to which you haven't responded.
 
Debaser said:
Your defense of Citadel and their business practices stirred some lively conversation, to which you haven't responded.
Click to expand...

Once again, what defense? They didn't break any laws, so no defense is required. Is there?

No question, there are people who aren't happy with how that company operates. Business isn't a popularity contest. And at the end of the day, we don't get to vote on the results. That's not a defense, but the reality.
 
cee said:
For most folks, employer plans are the only thing they can afford.
Click to expand...

This was the point the Democrats have made for more than 25 years, and why they feel so strongly about reforming the US health care and insurance system. Yet every time they attempt to bring it up, it becomes a huge political football. I have a lot of friends who'd like to become self-employed, and the sticking point for all of them has been health insurance. Unless their spouse is on a corporate or union plan, they can't do it. That's not right. There is a lot of anti-corporate rhetoric expressed on these boards, and some of it justified. But at the end of the day, their benefits package tends to be better than working for a small mom & pop. That certainly was the case for me.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom