• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Clear Channel bloodbath FORETOLD...ELEVEN years ago!

It's a blue Christmas on Oxford Street.
But not just there.

All across the USA, Clear Channel firings continue.
www.RadioAndRecords.com has actually created a web page to track them.

And it's not just Clear Channel.

On July 12, CBS Radio abruptly terminated 115 people, of all job descriptions; some recently hired, others longtime employees; at stations all over their O&O map, including stations they were offering for sale. Shocker firings included President of Programming Rob Barnett, who had just keynoted the Talkers magazine New Media Seminar.

But all of this is after-the-fact reporting, of a train wreck that began in 1995.

What you are about to read could give you chills.

One radio station owner, in Texas, was a lonely voice, trying to warn the most influential person in broadcasting that industry deregulation -- which RADIO STATION OWNERS were being rallied to support -- would end with what's happening on Oxford Street, and in markets everywhere right now.

The detail with which he predicted PRECISELY what has happened to radio since the Telecom Act of 1996 is no less than stunning.

Unlike many mom-and-pop owners who were seduced by Clear Channel's willingness to over-pay for stations like WHJJ, this Texan kept his stations. To this day, he's still there, in the corner office, managing an operation that employs more local talent than many larger market stations now have. It's called local programming.

Recently, he found the eerily prescient letter he wrote to then National Association of Broadcasters President Eddie Fritts...a letter that went unanswered...back before what-is-now-playing-out began to unfold.

This was 1995...so long ago that it took the writer a while to get modern computers to open the file he had written with word processor software then in use.

When he did, he sent me the letter.
When I read it, I was as taken-aback as you will be.

I asked him, my client Paul Gleiser, if I could print his letter, for the entire industry to read.
Without hesitation, he drawled, "PLEASE DO!"

See page 2 of the download you'll get when you click http://hollandcooke.com/20062007.pdf

Make sure you're sitting down when you read what Paul wrote, before the train left the station.

Good evening from Block Island,
HC
www.HollandCooke.com
 
Hi Holland,
Your letter is CHILLING indeed.
Let me also offer this; When WHJJ and James Corwin decided to go with Air America, wasn't it in fact, the next year and a few months of Air America that also caused the carnage ?
I remember the last book, Arlene had under a 1. Isn't this also about extreme left radio not working?
When Air America came to WHJJ, Arlene made a strong swing to the left.
When Air America left,
Howie Barte and Arlene became in reality, a local Air America.
I just wonder if John Depetro had stayed and there was no major turn to the left, would WHJJ have fallen?
After all WPRO is fine. They are Stable and making money.
I would love to read your thoughts as always!
My Best to you,
Chatty.
 
RE "Your letter is CHILLING indeed."

It's PAUL'S letter.
I just didn't want it to sit in a drawer somewhere.
So I appreciate his letting me share it with you.

I hope university professors are making a case study about the harm done by consolidation-run-amok.
For Paul to have foreseen it so vividly -- and been IGNORED -- is what's scary.

chattypattyri said:
Isn't this also about extreme left radio not working?

ANY change risks disrupting listeners' habit.

As for Air America: Whenever I've heard it, it had trouble keeping my attention.
Seemed plodding, ponderous.

The problem wasn't about Right or Left...it just seemed unentertaining...y'know?
 
Holland,
Interesting!!!
You know, I feel like I'm doing a postmortem!
One final question; If it's not right or left,
Why does the continual plodding of Savage and Hannity win share?
Cheers,
Chatty.
 
RE "Why does the continual plodding of Savage and Hannity win share?"

These shows don't win everywhere.
Where they do, it's because more diarykeepers report these shows than their competition.

Most affiliates program these shows because they can't afford to do local programming.

Most affiliates that win win because the competition's local or syndicated programming isn't as-good and/or on-as-good-a-signal.

Smart stations make ANY syndicated show sound like-a-part-of the station's own on-air family.

I work with stations that program these shows, in most cases situations I inherited, although I put Hannity's show on several stations when it was new.

Disclaimer: I know Sean; who's a very nice guy, genuniely affable.
'Haven't met Savage, who seems like a buffoon...but he sure cuts-through-the-clutter, mentally.
Remember: Arbitron is a memory test.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom