ercjncpr said:I always wondered how CC imagined sustaining 1500 radio stations over the long haul. I guess they found out they couldn't!
Bob_Hudson said:As with most of the big bad corporate mergers from around year 2000 they thought that they could bring some kind "economy of scale" to the table, as if these factory assembly lines. Think AOL-Time, HP-Compaq, CC-AM/FM (and whomever else). the people who created and brokered these made a bundle while employees lost jobs by the thousands and stockholders are still looking at share prices lower than they were in 2000 (in some cases way lower).
Jacquel7 said:question: curious where broadcasting professionals "laid off" from Clear Channel or else where
might look for work ~ forums or blogs?
thank you,
Jacqueline Lerner Aderman :![]()
magnadan said:For the record, it was AOL that bought Time Warner in 2001.
The idea of consolidation, which goes back to 1996, was to allow clusters of stations that were profitable to replace the 50% of stations that were not making money that year. The problem is that American broadcasters did not understand the synergies of clusters, and bungled the job in many cases. In other parts of the world, groups discovered how to take advantage of clustering decades before, but America is not wont to look at the experiences of other nations. It's the "not invented here" syndrome that almost killed MOtorola.
Jacquel7 said:my question "is" about those WHO ARE looking for work
in broadcasting - laid off from Clear Channel and other companies.
are there typically forums where I might find them?
Jackie
Jacquel7 said:thank you hamandcheese and media117 for providing some suggestions.
Jackie