True, it's just a headline service. But that's the way commercial All-News Radio is. It's not supposed to be NPR's All Things Considered. The All-News stations in the big cities also keep their stories fairly brief, no more than :30 to :60 seconds for a voiced story. Most stories the anchor reads are 3 to 5 sentences.
The trouble with "News 24/7" is there's only a few news stories per cycle and not a lot of field reporting. But it is just a start up for now.
By the way, Clear Channel does have its own top of the hour news service but I know of only one station that takes it, WWRL 1600 NYC, a Progressive Talk station. And it's not even a Clear Channel station. The newscast is only a minute long, anchored by Clear Channel people in Phoenix from what I understand. They don't identify the newscast as Clear Channel. In fact, they don't identify the newscast as part of any network. The first story starts cold with the first story and the anchor simply identifies himself at the end of the newscast as the sign off. WWRL uses it from 9am to early evening, weekdays only. So I guess it's not available nights or weekends. Local NYC Total Traffic people do a two minute newscast specifically for WWRL at 6am, 7am and 8am, including two 10 second spots.
I'm sure with scores of News-Talk stations across the country, Clear Channel has thought about having their own top of the hour newscast and keeping those commercial availabilites for their own sales. But where would they find the resources to replace Fox? Fox can tie into its TV network for some domestic reports and into co-owned News Corp. reporters across the globe, including all the Sky News people which Fox Radio News uses for many overseas stories. Fox News at the top of the hour might not be as good as CBS or ABC. But I fear a Clear Channel newscast at the top of the hour might be another step down.