Lopaka,
I'm generally in agreement with you when it comes to this board and related politics, but your last post is pretty callous:
>> No sympathy at all here. They were working for an evil
>> enterprise, in doing so they furthered its evil.
Wow, maybe you're joking or being sarcastic, but you just demonized a lot of really good people trying to make a living in this business, and I'm not talking about Lowry Mays. I don't work for C.C., but I have a lot of friends and colleagues who do, and many of them truly enjoy their jobs and have even been given the opportunity by C.C. to program well and do the right thing and manage stations as best they can. I know you're bummed KLSD was put down, but if anything C.C. extended Air America's lifespan by a couple of years and continues to give progressive talk a chance in several markets other than S.D.
These are not folks working for an evil enterprise, and if you really think C.C. is evil, you might as well lump CBS, Citadel, and every other radio outfit in with them, because there's a lot of companies out there who REALLY treat their employees poorly, ultimately leave less choices for listeners, and through their cheap, obnoxious, or hateful programming are an overall negative influence on the communities they serve. Sorry, but you can't lay the blame for this on one company and folks who were just bucking to hang on to an airshift or copywriter gig or selling airtime or trying to program several stations at once.
I'm not defending what C.C. has done, and I don't defend their track record of lowest-common denominator radio over the years, especially in the rock arena. I'll be the first to admit C.C.'s business/station "models" have done a lot to homogenize and dull-down radio and radio discussion, but I'll also be the first to say C.C. has made it a point to hire some really good, talented people the last few years to turn that perception around. They're not perfect, but saying those who were fired or let go from C.C. "were working for an evil enterprise [and], in doing so they furthered its evil" is a disturbing mirror validation of McVeigh's excuse for blowing up the federal building in Oklahoma City. Really disturbing.
Amazingly, you weren't done:
>> I am very glad the people who worked for Enron lost their
>> pensions and their life savings, their entire work histories
>> were directed toward stealing money from us Californians,
>> nobody ever deserved poverty more.
You know, I happen to know people who worked for Enron as well, and I don't know how to impress this upon you, but the victims of Enrom were otherwise decent, hard-working folks in the Houston area (and elsewhere) who were just accountants, numbers-crunchers, etc., with jobs. The whole company and all of their employees were duped by the evil scumbags who ran it. Those who lost everything were not the kind of faceless bureacrats associated with arranging train schedules for the Nazi party or anything like that. Yes, there were those sons of bi---- who were bragging about ripping off grandmothers in California (and elsewhere), and I can only hope there's a special place in Hades for them along with Ken Lay, W, Cheney, etc., but to say that anyone and everyone who worked at Enron had it coming is pretty close-minded and cruel of you.
These people lost their LIFE SAVINGS, everything they had, earned during the course of what seemed to be by all appearances honest work. Who knew their 401Ks and retirment plans were surreptitiously being emptied to cover margins collapsing out of sheer greed by those at the top? That the employees of Enron who weren't aggresively, cruelly ripping people off and giving Gray Davis fits over rolling blackouts are somehow also party to Enron's crimes is a disturbingly simple-minded response. Maybe you should rent "The Smartest Guys In the Room" to get the full weight of it.
I'm disappointed. You don't need a sense of nuance to understand that not everyone who works for Clear Channel or worked for Enron is some kind of a baby seal clubber, and while I know this board is to sound off, etc., to say so is really out of whack. I have this feeling you know better anyway, but however you slice it, you posted a pretty mean-spirited little diatribe. It sucks that people lose their jobs at any time of year, and it sucks that C.C. finds new, dramatic ways of making this happen. It's tiring to hear about and does nothing to help the morale of the company's employees, but blaming fired C.C. employees for their own dilemmas is as sick as blaming a rape victim for her own vicitmization. Please, stop generalizing like this.