• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

CLZ: the old MGX under a new name?

L

lookmanohands

Answer me this: If the ole 'MGX was doing so badly in the ratings that Saga flipped it to the Coast...why does the "new" CLZ sound a whole lot like the old 'MGX? I'm not being critical here: radio is a business and I'm wondering what the rationale was behind this business decision.

Or...do the programming folks at CLZ actually think they're doing something different ('cause different is good)?[i.e. is this just a case of misguided PD/upper management)?
 
Not to be disagreeable, but the music on the old 'MGX was nowhere near as broad as 'CLZ is now. MGX was basically a watered-down Jack, while CLZ is still solidly AAA. Sure, Tad might be gone (thank Jahweh), but the Saga folks know the format better than Brian James did.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom