Unfortunately such coax shields produce little effect, because the inside
and outside surfaces of a coax shield in this application are at r-f ground
potential only where they physically connect to a real r-f ground (conduct-
ors buried in the earth).
Due to skin effect (please Google), the r-f energy traveling on the outer sur-
face of the coax inner conductor between the transmitter r-f ground terminal
and a real r-f ground in this configuration couples to the inside surface of the
coax shield.
Most of that r-f energy crosses to the outside surface of the shield at the top
of the shield, confined again to that outer surface by skin effect, which then
produces radiation from the outer surface of the coax outer conductor.
The physical location where the base of the shield connects to a real
(functional) r-f ground is the only relevant r-f ground for the system.
The greater is the length of such a "shielded" ground lead, the more that conduc-
ting path will radiate, and the greater is the likelihood that a system using it
will be functionally non-compliant with15.219(b).
The link below leads to a NEC analysis of this configuration generated/posted
more than a year ago, for the stated conditions.
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h85/rfry-100/3-mMonopoleComparisons.gif
and outside surfaces of a coax shield in this application are at r-f ground
potential only where they physically connect to a real r-f ground (conduct-
ors buried in the earth).
Due to skin effect (please Google), the r-f energy traveling on the outer sur-
face of the coax inner conductor between the transmitter r-f ground terminal
and a real r-f ground in this configuration couples to the inside surface of the
coax shield.
Most of that r-f energy crosses to the outside surface of the shield at the top
of the shield, confined again to that outer surface by skin effect, which then
produces radiation from the outer surface of the coax outer conductor.
The physical location where the base of the shield connects to a real
(functional) r-f ground is the only relevant r-f ground for the system.
The greater is the length of such a "shielded" ground lead, the more that conduc-
ting path will radiate, and the greater is the likelihood that a system using it
will be functionally non-compliant with15.219(b).
The link below leads to a NEC analysis of this configuration generated/posted
more than a year ago, for the stated conditions.
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h85/rfry-100/3-mMonopoleComparisons.gif