E
editthis
Guest
No imaging/talk in between just song 1 segin' into song 2...good or bad Idea?
editthis said:No imaging/talk in between just song 1 segin' into song 2...good or bad Idea?
jpcgonebig said:Yea, a handful of CC stations are testing this through research,, Jacksonville, Albany, Cleveland..and some others.....
Yea, listeners dont care, although if your in a market with heavy competition, why WOULDN'T you ID yourself between EVERY song? When there is lots of competition, there is so much more cume floating around...why risk it?
I know here, where I am.... we've been runing VERY short, minimally produced sweepers and such. No pause between songs. Imaging up ramps and such. But I have been doing this type of IMAGING for years....I guess it pays off if done right![]()
spongebag7890 said:jpcgonebig said:Yea, a handful of CC stations are testing this through research,, Jacksonville, Albany, Cleveland..and some others.....
Yea, listeners dont care, although if your in a market with heavy competition, why WOULDN'T you ID yourself between EVERY song? When there is lots of competition, there is so much more cume floating around...why risk it?
I know here, where I am.... we've been runing VERY short, minimally produced sweepers and such. No pause between songs. Imaging up ramps and such. But I have been doing this type of IMAGING for years....I guess it pays off if done right![]()
Oh, I thought you all meant mentioning song IDs, not yourself.
But still, ID-ing yourself/inserting talks after as many songs as possible makes you:
1. More indentifiable.
2. Have a known personality that will only come on when you are on.
3. A stronger connection with your audience.
It's not terribly important, and I'd say a good 90-something% of listeners careless and focus on the music, but (especially females) if you want to connect with your audience more, it wouldn't hurt to mention who you are/insert talk in between songs. It makes you sound more indentifiable/like a person is behind the speakers.
jpcgonebig said:spongebag7890 said:jpcgonebig said:Yea, a handful of CC stations are testing this through research,, Jacksonville, Albany, Cleveland..and some others.....
Yea, listeners dont care, although if your in a market with heavy competition, why WOULDN'T you ID yourself between EVERY song? When there is lots of competition, there is so much more cume floating around...why risk it?
I know here, where I am.... we've been runing VERY short, minimally produced sweepers and such. No pause between songs. Imaging up ramps and such. But I have been doing this type of IMAGING for years....I guess it pays off if done right![]()
Oh, I thought you all meant mentioning song IDs, not yourself.
But still, ID-ing yourself/inserting talks after as many songs as possible makes you:
1. More indentifiable.
2. Have a known personality that will only come on when you are on.
3. A stronger connection with your audience.
It's not terribly important, and I'd say a good 90-something% of listeners careless and focus on the music, but (especially females) if you want to connect with your audience more, it wouldn't hurt to mention who you are/insert talk in between songs. It makes you sound more indentifiable/like a person is behind the speakers.
No, what I meant was, ID yourself....meaning your station, via imaging.
At the end of the day it's still a group of people trying WAAY too hard to re-invent the wheel. While I think it's a great idea to try and re-approach HOW we segue, i.e.: Dry or minimally produced sweepers up the ramps of songs, but to eliminate it is a blatent disreguard of branding principles.
Yes, I-Pod users don't hear liners between songs that say "I-Pod on shuffle," but a radio station's image is the product and without proper branding people will lose you in the "shuffle" of life. Why do you think the biggest brands in America (McDonald's, Coca Cola, etc.) continue to POUND their names into your head?
The number one complaint of the format is the repetition, while I think it will be hard for us to move too far away from the current power rotation formula, we can do more to give the perception that we aren't "playing the same 10 songs over and over." It's just going to take these "re-inventing" PDs to realize what we HAVE to do instead of thinking of something they think we SHOULD do.
.thatradioguy said:PPM is coming, yes; however, each station still needs to promote and keep up their branding.
For example, in my market, we have a CHR and a rhythmic station. Sometimes the dry segues on the CHR are a rhythmic song flowing into another rhythmic. Now, if anyone tries to remember what station they were listening to, they're going to first think of the rhythmic station because that's what they're used to hearing on that station.
Sure I like the idea of dry segues, it could be passed off as a mixshow if the songs blend together right, but, it's not going to help our brand.
There are so many ways this industry could go, if they are willing to take a risk and try. How about a new form of spots? Having two or three spotsets an hour is outdated... we need to re-invent everything if we're going to compete for the average listener today.