R
raydofan
Guest
I have taken another discussion and decided a sub-topic is worthy of its own thread.
Language in songs (played after hours) used to be of no concern. Now, there seems to be a moretorium on 'obscene lyrics and ideas' at any hour.
While a discussion of this idea is about 15 years too late, why hasn't there been a 'common fund' to defend college stations against FCC obscenity crackdown?
> Keep in mind: DJ's at WUSB have the
> freedom to play the music they want to play (as long as it
> meets FCC guidelines for indecency/obscenity).
Yeah, about that. This has been a question from at least the 70s and the WBAI case. Actually if you're familliar with WXPN (which actually is a commercially-formatted station in the non-com band) went from playing Ice-T rapping about putting an appendage through a car window (with full lyrics intact) to 3 chord gyno-rock. While this station is a strange animal-as that U-Penn has a business plan for the outlet-this station is an example of the ugliest corporatization of a 'college' station. This is a station whose licenseholder (I think the Board of Regents of the University of Pennsylvania.
It's possible that, if Ice-T or anyone else's lyric became a question, this well-funded station could have been on the front lines with a lot of back-end support. WXPN seems to have retreated into an easily supportable (and popular) format. Cases, such as the KBOO 'Your Revolution' fine, would have been pre-empted.
So, how about it? Why doesn't a general support system and fund exist? Why are licenseholders more willing to put programmers and jocks on the block than defend them?
OK, let 'er rip.
Language in songs (played after hours) used to be of no concern. Now, there seems to be a moretorium on 'obscene lyrics and ideas' at any hour.
While a discussion of this idea is about 15 years too late, why hasn't there been a 'common fund' to defend college stations against FCC obscenity crackdown?
> Keep in mind: DJ's at WUSB have the
> freedom to play the music they want to play (as long as it
> meets FCC guidelines for indecency/obscenity).
Yeah, about that. This has been a question from at least the 70s and the WBAI case. Actually if you're familliar with WXPN (which actually is a commercially-formatted station in the non-com band) went from playing Ice-T rapping about putting an appendage through a car window (with full lyrics intact) to 3 chord gyno-rock. While this station is a strange animal-as that U-Penn has a business plan for the outlet-this station is an example of the ugliest corporatization of a 'college' station. This is a station whose licenseholder (I think the Board of Regents of the University of Pennsylvania.
It's possible that, if Ice-T or anyone else's lyric became a question, this well-funded station could have been on the front lines with a lot of back-end support. WXPN seems to have retreated into an easily supportable (and popular) format. Cases, such as the KBOO 'Your Revolution' fine, would have been pre-empted.
So, how about it? Why doesn't a general support system and fund exist? Why are licenseholders more willing to put programmers and jocks on the block than defend them?
OK, let 'er rip.