I saw an article in the Houston Chronicle regarding this event...
Basically TW Houston, Kansas City, SW Texas (Laredo/Rio Grande Border), SE Texas (Beaumont) plus a couple of other areas were joint ventures between Time Warner and TCI (later AT&T now Comcast). It goes back to when Houston, KC and some of these other areas had two systems serving them (parts of Houston had TCI, others had TW - of course it goes back to Storer and Warner Amex cable, but I digress...). The two companies put together a joint venture (JC) so that the markets weren't split; the result was a 50-50 venture with TW doing the Day-to-Day operations (Comcast just sat back and absorbed the profits...).
As of June XX this year, the JV could be broken up, but the rules of the breakup were like this: either party could dissolve the JV, but the party requesting the dissolution, had to divide up all of the assets of the JV, including debt; the other party then got to choose which part they got. (Basically an "I cut, you pick" scenario)
Comcast requested the breakup, and they divided it up into two pools: the Houston pool (with 790,000 customers in Houston and $2Billion in debt from the JV) and the "Kansas City Pool" (with 789,000 customers in KC, Laredo, Corpus Christi, New Mexico, El Paso, and Beaumont). TW chose the KC pool, and Comcast ended up in Houston. Comcast ends up with one contiguous system (vs. the spread out systems of the rest), but also the debt (owed mostly to Comcast and TW). I'm guessing that Comcast will write off the debt owed to itself from the JV, but will still have the debt to TW.
I'm guessing once the change takes place in 2007, you may see some agressive marketing toward satellite users, since that's their competition (really not each other...).
Hope this makes sense.
Jim