Shredder said:
this may be a bit off topic, but why did clear channel suddenly decide to buy as many radio stations as it could? IF they are in debt, apparently it wasn't a good business decision and didn't help the market much..
I'm not sure I follow where you're going here. Clear's total number of stations has been declining considerably for several years now as the company has unloaded smaller markets all over the country. It's been out of northern New England and Utica, for instance, for three years or so. It's been more than a decade since Clear tried to "buy as many radio stations as it could." The company has been very judicious in its purchasing in recent years. Its two big purchases in 2012 were both very strategic pickups in top-ten markets (101.7 Boston and WOR) where it owned less than a full portfolio, and both purchases were made at prices far lower than the market peak in 2007.
Back to the original thrust of the thread: the difference between CBS TV/CBS Radio and Comcast/Clear Channel is that CBS consciously built its radio clusters in TV markets with an eye toward the cross-ownership caps. Clear has built its clusters up to the radio-only maximums in most of its biggest markets, which means there would have to be spinoffs to get under the joint radio/TV caps if those clusters were combined with the two TVs that Comcast/NBC owns in most of those same markets.
That's not automatically a deal-breaker. In many cases, a combined Comcast/CC could get under the cap by shedding AMs. In New York, Clear could probably keep all five of its NYC FMs and WOR along with WNBC and WNJU. The real effects would be felt on the fringes, where I suspect Comcast wouldn't be able to keep Clear's Hudson Valley and northwest NJ clusters and might also have to speed up its sale of WALK. Same deal in southern California, where Clear has a sizable (and fairly profitable) cluster of stations in Riverside/San Bernardino. Those stations can be co-owned with Clear Channel LA because they're in separate Arbitron markets, but the TV-radio rules look instead at signal overlap, of which there's plenty.
In any event, Comcast would have to have the appetite for CC's considerable debt load, and I don't see that happening, either.