Unfortunately none of them are entertaining anymore. That's what distinguished early Rush. That's what used to distinguish conservative talk. They used to be entertainers. Now it’s all ideology, and that's not funny or entertaining. Radio is supposed to be entertaining. We've already talked about it being a bad sales environment. You might as well listen to preaching radio. WWE and UFC are more entertaining.
The justification that always seemed to be given for such one-sided programming was that “they’re just entertainers”. I never felt that was particularly true, but, now, most talk radio has more in common with Radio Pyongyang and its insistent hysteria than with any kind of audio entertainment.
That's why the topic of this thread is to broaden the content beyond politics. Because talking about politics isn't entertaining, even when you agree with it. There are lots of other things to talk about. We need to get beyond ideology. A day will come when we realize we all have to live together. That means there needs to be compromise and consensus. Neither exist in talk radio right now. The fact that there are differences among conservative hosts demonstrates that even they are getting bored with it.
Talk for the sole purpose of entertainment…e.g. “shooting the breeze”…seems to be limited nowadays to either sports formats or podcasts.
I’ll write more about this later, probably on the New Mexico forum; for now, I’ll mention that I’ve just spent a few days in Taos, New Mexico. From a radio perspective, it’s an unusual place. There’s no conservative talk, for one thing. There is a licensee called “Cultural Energy” that mostly broadcasts programs from Pacifica. Many of the ones I heard were hard to listen to and I tuned away from them quickly. Why? They were preaching all the time…just like right-wing commercial-radio hosts. Thank goodness there was a repeater for an NPR member station near Taos, so there was something informative that lets listeners make up their own minds without being hectored constantly.