• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Comments On Tulsa?

Re: ???

it's not a fight.<P ID="signature">______________
RADIOELIZABETH
Pleasant, Passionate, Persuasive
www.radioelizabeth.com</P>
 
Re: Neutral_Observer...

> Was there something specific you were trying to get a
> discussion on?
>
> I mean...a certain aspect of the whole situation that you
> wanted to discuss.


Sure, but, now honestly deciding to be as inoffensive and kind as everybody else, I'm not going to bring it up, myself. At this point, I'd just as soon see the thread mysteriously vanish. :)




> And in regard to this...
>
> > I know, but it's obvious they don't know the format or the
> > audience. Not a one of them has gotten close to
> > understanding or even accurately describing what just
> > happened.


Just in case someone might misconstrue what was said, I want to make it clear that the "they" in the above refers to the board posters...other than Gary, of course.




> What is there to describe? A corporate cluster flipped a
> struggling rock station's format to something they thought
> might be more profitable. Of course...there are further
> nuances involved.


...and in those "nuances" lies the case study many will learn from at some point down the road. I hope and pray you win this without much pain, but, as I'm sure you have guessed, I think it's a battle that didn't have to happen.
 
Re: Neutral_Observer...

> I'm going with Gary on this one...
>
> Can you describe the elephant to us? Perhaps we're missing
> the direction you would like to go...


I've decided to let it go...it's nothing tougher than Programming 201 and should be or become obvious to anyone who listens to the both of them.
 
Re: ???

> I am lost what are ya'll fighting over?? i dont get it??
>


There's a fight?

Not that I'm aware of.


I am of the belief that KXOJ's new battle didn't have to happen, and what I thought might come up is the reason I have that belief. But it hasn't, and, at this point, I'd just as soon exercise kindness and charity because talking about it could be misconstrued as the opposite.
 
Re: Neutral_Observer...

So, what I'm gathering is that you believe there is some shortcoming on KXOJ's part that enabled another group to sign on a station of common format?

If so, I welcome critique. Please share what you feel we could do better. Our interest is to get better. And if you have something valuable...please share.

You seem to have good programming sense from what I've seen of your posts in the past. So I'm anxious to hear.

You're a friend and your opinion is valued.



>
> ...and in those "nuances" lies the case study many will
> learn from at some point down the road. I hope and pray you
> win this without much pain, but, as I'm sure you have
> guessed, I think it's a battle that didn't have to happen.
>
 
Re: ???

I understand if you're uncomfortable sharing a public critique and/or rebuke.

Please...the only way to improve is to hear honest feedback. And this is what I'm interested in. I won't become offended. The spirit of offense is pride. And being teachable is the way to success.

If it's something we can use...then we will prayerfully consider it.

Please...share.

And if you're uncomfortable doing so publicly...do so privately to [email protected]

Thanks.






> > I am lost what are ya'll fighting over?? i dont get it??
> >
>
>
> There's a fight?
>
> Not that I'm aware of.
>
>
> I am of the belief that KXOJ's new battle didn't have to
> happen, and what I thought might come up is the reason I
> have that belief. But it hasn't, and, at this point, I'd
> just as soon exercise kindness and charity because talking
> about it could be misconstrued as the opposite.
>
<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by GaryThompson on 12/06/05 05:52 PM.</FONT></P>
 
Re: Neutral_Observer...

Again this is the tease from you orginally: "Surprised nothing's been said...."
We just went from there. If you would like to be more specific then please do so. I think it's highly unfair to give us a hint of what you want and then shake your head in despair because we didn't respond as you would have liked.
Why even bring it up at all? Here's my question since you are fragmenting and playing sentence games :) "Why?"
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom