• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Compact One-Directional AM Receiving Antennae?

This is in reference to a point made by a poster in the '2009 Want List' thread regarding directional receiving antennae. Instead of adding it to the thread, I figured it to be somewhat a different subject.

In a quite random, accidental and primitive way a few winters ago during the night, I managed to null the far-louder CJBC Toronto completely, to ID the station detected nibbling at them way under -- WAMO Pittsburgh. You know how it is ; you fiddle around with the bearing of a 4-foot accoustic loop and the GE Superadio's built-in stick right next to it and sometimes get some goofy lobe or null. In some fashion I nailed it exact. But I had little clue as to what I was doing other than arranging a huge null of Toronto and/or a nice lobe toward Pittsburgh.

I do know that long ago there was this 'LSCA' antenna -- iIrc, a Loop-Sense-Cardioid Array' -- put together by a DXer in Florida. It took an amplified 4-foot loop and mixed it with some form of destructive interference introduced by a longwire to achieve some form of one-directional reception. That's the way directional stations *broadcast*, correct? Mixing the phases and causing destructive and constructive interference?

And Beveridge (sp?) antennae can be awesome for that one-direction pursuit, of course.

But for those of us with limited property, I ask if anyone has had experience with the LSCA or maybe has fashioned a more compact model for AM. Say a plain 4-foot unamplified loop and a longwire maybe 50 feet long and with little soldering. It'd be like the antenna that the DXer from Florida built, but with less electronics.

I've been out of the AM DX mainstream for a while. Like twenty years. Has someone come up with a relatively compact/inexpensive setup that achieves that one-direction reception in a form that would make rudimentary sense as to what we electronically-challenged are really doing?

As I said, my system here was crude and hit-and-miss, but it was also a small and compact system that for some reason worked. Obviously, I had opened this reception window to Pittsburgh while at the same time probably dimming the lights in the CJBC studios. From my den, those two places are not at right angles. And since skywave is also a factor, the reception process becomes three dimensional instead of just two.

Ideally, since a compass is magnetic, the little setup might include a visual compass, much like you would use the bearing on the base box of a rotating TV aerial. Wheee!
 
C Crane is selling some of their twin coil antennas as orphans for $50.

A lot of us home brew box loop antennas, lots of gain in a small antenna (if you can call a 4 foot loop small - but compared to a long wire it is). The only disadvantage is having to re-tune as you scan the band.
 
Hya RBruce ....

The fellow in Florida with the cardioid array -- I'm sure I'm spelling that right -- was Ron Schatz. Yeah, I'm sure I'm spelling *that* right, too.

Heck -- the re-tune of the loop never bothered we pork chops in the past, hi. In fact, there indeed was something deliciously vindictive upon hearing that 'wooooom' effect when the tweak of the variable capacitor arrived at true resonance at your staked-out frequency .... your duck patch.

I once saw an outdoor 'diamond' loop (which obviously stood somehow on its point) which had three fixed capacitors as tuning guides. It was ropes and pulley operation. There was no way to tune it variably. Non-electrical. Worked fantastic.

But true loops receive and direct in a figure eight, right? I'd been asking if someone whose expertise in electronics is/was decidedly more primitive than Schatz who knew of a way of cutting off one of the lobes.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom