Alan Fletcher said:
I'd have to say, ultimately, the finger has to invariably point to government.
First, we have to understand that the way our Constitution is SUPPOSED to work,
WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE GOVERNMENT (isn't that how the Constitution starts out? "
We The People"...hmmm"). And we elect representatives to act in OUR BEST - COLLECTIVE -INTEREST. I don't mean to turn this into a political discussion, but the point needs to be understood that we have a responsibility to stay informed, and tell our representatives what
WE THE PEOPLE want [just like we think radio stations have a responsibility to be local and keep us informed]. I was 26 in 1996, and had little political interest, but it doesn't seem the
public [read:
We the People] was truly aware of what was about to take place. And part of the problem is that several "acts" were bundled up into one big "act". The Telecommunications Act of 1996 also affected The Telephone Industry, and by the name of it alone, one wouldn't think to look for "Radio Consolidation" in it.
If people are truly interested in "SAVING" radio [or changing anything for that matter], they need to stop whining and complaining on a message board, and get politically involved. You might not win, but you'll have the satisfaction that you really tried. Politicians generally don't act with a conscience of good/bad or right/wrong, like we want them to. They act with two motivations: 1. what will get them re-elected and 2. with a squeaky wheel syndrome: "The squeaky wheel gets the grease."
It's one thing to use the Internet to inform others of what is going on and share information like this, but if you are not part of the solution, you may as well be part of the problem. For the general public, it is easier to point fingers at someone else to take responsibility instead of taking action themselves. It's also easy to whine on a remote, anonymous message board that a very small fraction of the population see. To truly make a difference, why not take the energy you use here, and write a letter to your congressman to do something about it...to change it back. I admit I have not done this myself, yet...but I am not pointing fingers blaming someone else for something I should have been aware of.
Again, you might not get what you want, but you are doing something PROactive instead of REactive.
So, now think about the NAB, what was their position on the TC Act of 96? Were they looking out for the best interest of the Public like they say they are now:
being opposed to the XM/Sirius merger? A topic for another thread maybe??