• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Congress Questions Twitter About Music

Twitter and other social media have become a way to share music. The problem is that Twitter isn't licensed for music. As a result, when people share music on Twitter, that leads to copyright problems. Congress wants that to change:


Of course YouTube is licensed for music, and often people will run their music first through YouTube and then post that video on Twitter.

Section 230 says that platforms can't be sued for content posted by users. But the music creators still want to get paid.
 
Twitter and other social media have become a way to share music. The problem is that Twitter isn't licensed for music. As a result, when people share music on Twitter, that leads to copyright problems. Congress wants that to change:


Of course YouTube is licensed for music, and often people will run their music first through YouTube and then post that video on Twitter.

Section 230 says that platforms can't be sued for content posted by users. But the music creators still want to get paid.
Also one has to deal with labels putting their talents profile on Twitter how does that work though? I get its a label and songwriters contract issue though via platform.
 
Also one has to deal with labels putting their talents profile on Twitter how does that work though? I get its a label and songwriters contract issue though via platform.

The profile is not the same thing as music. When a label or an artist site posts music they will either use Vevo, a video player that pays music royalties, or they'll direct visitors to authorized streaming sites such as Apple, Amazon, or Spotify. In either case they get paid. What this congressional hearing is about is people posting songs through players that don't pay royalties.
 
The profile is not the same thing as music. When a label or an artist site posts music they will either use Vevo, a video player that pays music royalties, or they'll direct visitors to authorized streaming sites such as Apple, Amazon, or Spotify. In either case they get paid. What this congressional hearing is about is people posting songs through players that don't pay royalties.
Good point in the royalties issue.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom