Re: Appreciate all responses !
Just want to say THANKS to robnokshus06 for the clarification of what Simi-dude was trying to say.. I understand your explanation, 5 X 5. For some reason, it wasn't clear in previous posts.
As far as "piling on" goes, one guesses that ANY accurate information relayed about jr's nightly performance, wall of mistakes and foot in mouth disease is now considered "piling on?" Once again, interesting.
Maybe my posts are not really for "jr. sniffers" or "jr. apologists." So be it.
As far as I can reckon, THIS is a free speech (yes, within limits) board. The expression of thoughts and ideas, along with ackowledging someone on the air who is in over his head is NOT against the law. Please feel free to let me know when I break whatever law I'm not aware of. Will be more than glad to take a step back, apologize or re-think anything this journalist has written, in order to come into line with present day guidelines.
As far as jr. goes, let's get the latest blunder out of the way, so we can turn to what seems to be tolerated on air behavior from the KFI programming dept. See: good for the goose, not good for the gander.
Monday night within the 1st half hour, jr. mentioned in some semi coherent attempt at knowledge that the late TV news anchor Tom Snyder, was probably not even in Los Angeles in the mid 60's. Wrong again, jr! Mr. Snyder was with KTLA and their news dept. in 1963. Nice research, again. Mr. Snyder was reporting on a Saturday afternoon about the Baldwin Hills Dam disaster. That would've been in mid-December, I believe.
Yeah, we know. You were just a "country bumpkin from the flats in the Valley." We know. We hear it all the time. Doesn't make any sense, but we hear it all the time. That A-D-D of his should really be checked professionally. Yeah, you were still in diapers in '63, so no one would've expected you to know about the dam breaking, Mr. Snyder reporting on it, or the first use of a news helicopter showing actual rescues.
There's this thing called the internet, maybe you've caught wind of it? And if not, maybe a bio somewhere in a BOOK or another place re: Mr. Snyder's career would've helped out. Just a thought. I could keep you from making a fool out of yourself on a daily basis, but listening to you drone on about what YOU THINK you know, without so much as a fact-check is really more amusing!
Then, to add insult to injury, jr. proceeds to tell the audience that he likes everyone over at KNBC TV News, and proceeds to TRY and name everyone, and misses. BIG TIME! Hey, jr., I know you're just a country.... never mind.. You mentioned Connie Chung being over there. So unless you were stroking out from those fake ciggys you keep talking about, you'd HAVE to know that Connie Chung was NEVER at Channel 4, but WAS at Channel 2 in the 70's. Unless that was your attempt at humor, which like most of your stuff, misses the mark, while people are thinking you don't really know what you're talking about. Nothing new here. People (on or off the air) who continually enjoy talking about things they know very little or nothing about are folks who just enjoy hearing the sound of their own voice. And they're rarely wrong. Right?
We'll address the difference between suspending J + K and my calling for jr's suspension in another post. They are two different items entirely. Just don't want to offend the "jr. sniffers" and "jr. apologists" in one onslaught. Don't want to seem like I'm "piling on" just for pointing out what a hack he is or has become.
People make mistakes. I get it.. Made many of my own, and don't mind being held responsible for them. But, as jr. is so fond of reminding us (again and again) that the whole joke about "What the H____ did Jesse say" is the fact that Jesse is a "public speaker" with seemingly NO public speaking skills. That's the irony, eh, jr?
And the person making that statement about one of his own (one of his ONLY) original bits, is a guy who nightly, has a problem with public speaking and in turn, stumbles all over himself with almost EVERY sentence. Listen closely if ya don't believe me.
We're just pointing out the obvious to those who haven't noticed. That's what we're here for.