Yeah.Back in the '90s, opponents of public broadcasting cited the Discovery Channel and History Channel as reasons why public funding was unnecessary. How did that work out?
Add A&E (then referred to Arts & Entertainment).
Back in the 90s, these networks actually had very good content worthy of public television.
Alas, by the late 2000s, all had declined into the sensational reality TV wasteland that many other networks seemed to likewise succumb to.
Nowadays, A&E et al are virtually indistinguishable from USA and the like, which in turn is virtually indistinguishable from Fox. It's sad.
c