I'm referring to those who draw those rather static looking artworks that must suffice in jurisdictions where cameras are prohibited in courtrooms.
Do they have photographic memories usable when it's time to depict what they witnessed? Do (or can) they submit their work before the hearing they're covering adjourns?
And as an aside, I remember on Justice Kagan's first day on the SCOTUS, seeing (on FNC) an artwork of Ms. Kagan retreating to the chambers when the SC began hearing a case she had handled as solicitor general (and thus had to recuse herself from when the SC began hearing it). I thought that artwork looked rather ridculous as it was a moment that IMO lent itself better to moving or photographic imagery than artwork.
ixnay
Do they have photographic memories usable when it's time to depict what they witnessed? Do (or can) they submit their work before the hearing they're covering adjourns?
And as an aside, I remember on Justice Kagan's first day on the SCOTUS, seeing (on FNC) an artwork of Ms. Kagan retreating to the chambers when the SC began hearing a case she had handled as solicitor general (and thus had to recuse herself from when the SC began hearing it). I thought that artwork looked rather ridculous as it was a moment that IMO lent itself better to moving or photographic imagery than artwork.
ixnay